Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<JWO2G07WD4l3OOZ0iu5_ESbFkKs@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <JWO2G07WD4l3OOZ0iu5_ESbFkKs@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <zzRMVwrDvZCAHeIta8vMnBBxp8E@jntp>
 <155cdc8a628d47be1632791227bccf99425b1d5e@i2pn2.org> <en_fjxuLKegQPxOwdC8lXsKVbbI@jntp>
 <b6f3db1f122addc847d551f14766c9bc090a2d39@i2pn2.org> <va1ra4$3bld7$1@dont-email.me> <cB1y4KsEseyrfvMXAJJ2TijMcX4@jntp>
 <va31ko$3havl$1@dont-email.me> <VqqLFKi62z9rl82Gg4Mxsdp4YYg@jntp> <227e12c2862e139d022279d3ae5bdd34427bafae@i2pn2.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: 0mN-0hVYN899sRjTRyNhOtcOav0
JNTP-ThreadID: KFm3f7lT2HjaTSiMfnv5xqZoSBw
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=JWO2G07WD4l3OOZ0iu5_ESbFkKs@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 24 12:32:30 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-08-21T12:32:30Z/8995089"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Bytes: 2929
Lines: 33

Le 21/08/2024 à 13:32, Richard Damon a écrit :
> On 8/21/24 6:44 AM, WM wrote:
>> Le 20/08/2024 à 23:25, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>> WM explained :
>>>> Le 20/08/2024 à 12:31, FromTheRafters a écrit :
>>>>> on 8/19/2024, Richard Damon supposed :
>>>>
>>>>>> You can not derive a first number > 0 in any of the Number System 
>>>>>> that we have been talking about, Unit Fractions, Rationals or 
>>>>>> Reals, so you can't claim it to exist.
>>>>>
>>>>> Not in their natural ordering.
>>>>
>>>> Dark numbers have no discernible order. It is impossible to find the 
>>>> smallest unit fraction or the next one or the next one. It is only 
>>>> possible to prove that NUF(x) grows by 1 at every unit fraction. It 
>>>> starts from 0.
>> 
>>> Normally, the unit fractions are listed in the sequence one over one, 
>>> one over two, one over three etcetera. There is a first but no last. 
>>> Now you have started from the wrong 'end'
>> 
>> No, I have started from the other end. It exists at x > 0 because NUF(0) 
>> = 0.

> But the other end doesn't "begin" with a first Natural Number Unit 
> fraction, if it has a beginning that will be a trans-finite number.

No, it is a finite number. ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 holds for all 
and only reciprocals of natural numbers.

Regards, WM