Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<Jeff-Relf.Me@May.10--7.55pm.Seattle.2024> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us14.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=O^Z;Z2U4HR_[lMdQYHake_HWonT5<]0T]Q;nb^V>PUfV=AnO\FUBY[PnF54O@^\1?T2HnPOf8HLeUL87<8DH_2DRQcAN0ZSkDHQH^TCC\2cRC\ X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net Content-Type: Text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Relf" <Usenet@Jeff-Relf.Me> Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 19:55:36 -0700 (Seattle) Message-ID: <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.10--7.55pm.Seattle.2024> References: <v1885r$1tvk0$1@dont-email.me> <l9q0r3FoouU1@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.5--1.25pm.Seattle.2024> <663e6242$0$10540$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.10--4.32pm.Seattle.2024> <663ebf38$0$3711194$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: SSD drives should NOT be defragmented. User-Agent: Jeff-Relf.Me/z1.HTM Lines: 5 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1715396142 reader.netnews.com 3711202 127.0.0.1:43901 Bytes: 1166 AndreM wrote: > NTFS is also arguably worse than ext4, > especially since the latter resists fragmentation. SSD drives, like mine, should NOT be defragmented.