Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <JgwfTY5zdr-R7hBBRn-JmVc0SDc@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: No evidence
References: <4144a4a378a851665e4e8cf08dd46467@www.novabbs.com> <vc3l0m$1d7l3$1@dont-email.me>
 <22237708faf597ef0142e87eb1c821ba@www.novabbs.com> <vc6cj0$2470v$1@dont-email.me>
 <549e1842f99e4bb16501ff3c87183a89@www.novabbs.com> <vcb5tu$3c9p5$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: H6ozkHJI49r41KUR9j27iwoh96I
JNTP-ThreadID: 17f4d33c8c292ee6$1183694$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=JgwfTY5zdr-R7hBBRn-JmVc0SDc@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 24 15:16:06 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-09-17T15:16:06Z/9025780"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 2585
Lines: 25

Le 17/09/2024 à 08:00, Mikko a écrit :
> On 2024-09-15 21:27:28 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
> 
>> Mikko: Then relativity has two types of time contraction. One due to
>> gravity and the other due to relative motion as in the H&K they have
>> time dilate in one direction and contract in the other.
> 
> Both theories have time dilation and contraction for moving clocks,
> depending on how clocks are synchronized and compared. General
> Relativity has in addition effects from gravity.

I do not share this point of view.
It is already said, wrongly in my opinion, that we must separate the 
notion of internal chornotropy of watches from the longitudinal Doppler 
effect.
For me, this is already excessive.
And then we say: "Let's add general relativity effects due to the presence 
of masses".
On this ground, I have even more difficulty following the ramblings of 
scientists.
I am not saying that there are no effects, nor that the effects are not 
measurable.
I am simply wondering if all this, from A to Z, is not just simple 
relativistic effects that could be considered pure native SR.

R.H.