Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<Jt6dnWVRTpYV-vr7nZ2dnZfqnPEAAAAA@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:52:23 +0000
Subject: Re: Is Light Stationary?
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
References: <1QikHOioDRdsCOjqHQjm%matthewmpower@gmail.com>
 <1qur7we.i3dmhjesaip1N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
 <c73ac376a74b4094dbcf5f0c972f1006@www.novabbs.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:49:38 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c73ac376a74b4094dbcf5f0c972f1006@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <Jt6dnWVRTpYV-vr7nZ2dnZfqnPEAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 23
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-FC9eaVohlS9UgaQFV/FsOYg9C0LlYjUm5pRZDBX4KIjITTjuDay0nmxsv3V6F3ckkRg0FjgOjTjLDeC!cG3VsGs+tYuLKYTseSmIgiT+SSL6XSOIneIfM9GgCv/peZiiNaeS0DOykdhiXPc2Hu/YskFego3V!7w==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 1846

On 06/10/2024 01:25 PM, gharnagel wrote:
> J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
>> TRS-90 <matthewmpower@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > If the speed of light is the invariant, could it be that everything
>> else
>> > is moving and that light is somehow stationary?
>>
>> Certainly, according to light itself,
>>
>> Jan
>
> :-)
>
> Light has no mass, which is why it can exist in that frame. Unfortunately,
> observers are composed of bradyons, which have mass.  Sorry, no
> observers
> allowed.

Light has no charge, why is it called "electromagnetic"?