| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<Jt6dnWVRTpYV-vr7nZ2dnZfqnPEAAAAA@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:52:23 +0000 Subject: Re: Is Light Stationary? Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <1QikHOioDRdsCOjqHQjm%matthewmpower@gmail.com> <1qur7we.i3dmhjesaip1N%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl> <c73ac376a74b4094dbcf5f0c972f1006@www.novabbs.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 13:49:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <c73ac376a74b4094dbcf5f0c972f1006@www.novabbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <Jt6dnWVRTpYV-vr7nZ2dnZfqnPEAAAAA@giganews.com> Lines: 23 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-FC9eaVohlS9UgaQFV/FsOYg9C0LlYjUm5pRZDBX4KIjITTjuDay0nmxsv3V6F3ckkRg0FjgOjTjLDeC!cG3VsGs+tYuLKYTseSmIgiT+SSL6XSOIneIfM9GgCv/peZiiNaeS0DOykdhiXPc2Hu/YskFego3V!7w== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 1846 On 06/10/2024 01:25 PM, gharnagel wrote: > J. J. Lodder wrote: > >> TRS-90 <matthewmpower@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > If the speed of light is the invariant, could it be that everything >> else >> > is moving and that light is somehow stationary? >> >> Certainly, according to light itself, >> >> Jan > > :-) > > Light has no mass, which is why it can exist in that frame. Unfortunately, > observers are composed of bradyons, which have mass. Sorry, no > observers > allowed. Light has no charge, why is it called "electromagnetic"?