Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<KDKdnarg5JDvFOL7nZ2dnZfqnPiWy52d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 04:11:30 +0000 Subject: Re: Einstein's second mass-energy formula m'/m = e/c^2 Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <eN6cnRy1afc0GuL7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 21:11:55 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <eN6cnRy1afc0GuL7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <KDKdnarg5JDvFOL7nZ2dnZfqnPiWy52d@giganews.com> Lines: 31 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-E54NuABIUkEAja6wmUQaTurEY6KpcL4yNdmhhDwHeoW3p4HpGbcbKIEXXOhPGxxTU0wPskdY3XoWH7a!DfP3td2kiwgM6Sz4i9QW/7X+K4PsMdCSaXl+t74teAyJqZ8Ajo7LNhV8ZHEuutHJlGasM7ym8a4m X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2196 On 06/28/2024 09:04 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > In "Out of My Later Years", Einstein's introduces another > mass-energy equivalence formula after kinetic terms. > > So if it's sort of Einstein's second-most famous formula, > why hasn't anybody heard of it? > > m'/m = e/c^2 > > It introduces that the terms in the rotational, make > for that mass-energy equivalence only sits in the > rotational setting, among all the other usual terms. > > It's introduced in a brief note near the end of > the material on science in Einstein's "Out of My > Later Years". > > It really makes for a sort of way to make it so > that the space-contraction results real while > also that the linear is rather Galilean, while > still fulfilling all the usual derivations, if > not necessarily the rhetoric or intuitions, > yet very intuitionistically while all formally. > > > It's pretty great I wonder why it's not well-known. > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_factor