Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <KZhMQORhgUvz_-5HcU9N2EfLhl4@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: The puzzle science is solving
References: <18028c43ae3207f6$154608$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <29b2833796a5e458d9a73af6b0c42bed@www.novabbs.com>
 <oQr_EXdbPn0FCtPjv5NJ8GBqQtI@jntp> <1802a86653504235$206958$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: DH5spXcIeLGt_5Jd-KzFuuQV7ng
JNTP-ThreadID: 18028c43ae3207f6$154608$936536$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=KZhMQORhgUvz_-5HcU9N2EfLhl4@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 24 16:14:23 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="c18607c6c82617dff39a53233baac853633e58c4"; logging-data="2024-10-28T16:14:23Z/9078241"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <python@not-formail.invalid>
Bytes: 3067
Lines: 42

Le 28/10/2024 à 16:46, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 28.10.2024 o 15:07, Python pisze:
>> Le 28/10/2024 à 13:05, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
>>> On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 7:10:30 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is not "how things really are".
>>>
>>> I agree.
>>>
>>>> It is "which word sequences are good ones".
>>>
>>> I disagree.  Humans build maps of reality.
>>> They're called scientific theories.
>> 
>> If "word sequences that are good ones" means that de-compiled forms of 
>> the programs we have in our brains i.e. logic, maths and physics (for 
>> instance) are matching the actual programs that are correct
> 
> But there is no one-and-unique "correct".
> There are just local optimums, and they're
> floating (what is good now doesn't have to be
> good in 100 years).

We could agree on that. Rather than local optimums I would say that they 
are more complete "High level" implementations of the "machine language" 
in your brains.

>> (because evolution made sur they do)
> 
> In some centuries  [SR] will be
> only remembered as an antipattern of "how
> and why you should never make a scientific
> theory or any description of anything".

Your mistake is to deny that SR, as well as NM, are fitting very well with 
this line of thinking. As well as QM. Krivine addresses this in is book 
and articles with specific words on SR and QM in addition to NM.

BTW, SR is not a "theory of anything", neither is GR. QM in a way is, or 
claim to have such a goal, but, IMHO QM could be more a theory of 
information (or a blueprint of one) than a physical theory.