Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<KgsNxvPyqt-0B8k9AVRrfDcva1k@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <KgsNxvPyqt-0B8k9AVRrfDcva1k@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v73otr$ptku$1@dont-email.me> <cGLopKEv1S9qR2nNCvaF8IqKf-s@jntp> <v75m18$1828i$2@dont-email.me> <esHcGgnWa-kSH-yFGrczTDSFLzc@jntp> <v76e49$1cn1q$1@dont-email.me> <xLBGlqr9FmVi45Mlcw6nJbdFqqM@jntp> <v76hh2$1d5jc$2@dont-email.me> <MINhbylBZhXuFEEVBuuOVNQAhME@jntp> <v78vh4$1u5pb$2@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: laO81nOOC9-524saJFYYIgCA0ck JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=KgsNxvPyqt-0B8k9AVRrfDcva1k@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Wed, 17 Jul 24 18:26:53 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-17T18:26:53Z/8952792"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> Bytes: 2435 Lines: 25 Le 17/07/2024 à 19:37, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : > Den 16.07.2024 21:35, skrev Richard Hachel: >> Le 16/07/2024 à 21:26, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : >>> I am not interested in your obviously inconsistent >>> theory which give predictions which are not in accordance >>> with reality. >> >> You are right. >> A theory that does not agree with experimentation cannot be correct. > > Alors vous l'avez enfin compris ! > > Votre théorie prédit que la vitesse réelle de > le proton dans le LHC est 6947c. > > La vitesse réelle des protons est mesurée comme étant inférieure à c. > > Puisque la vitesse prévue est différente de > la vitesse mesurée, votre théorie est fausse. Non. Ma théorie prédit que la vitesse observable du proton sera Vo=0.9999998c Vous mélangez tout. R.H.