Path: ...!npeer.as286.net!npeer-ng0.as286.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <L6BMpB-hddUTlDOq9zDtcxNt6Fk@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Equation complexe
References: <oAvE_mEWK82aUJOdwpGna1Rzs1U@jntp> <cd899a53-0106-466f-8e13-a2e8e57ca2ba@att.net> <YEkr142e3Iw10sNTl94yHf-u1kY@jntp>
 <CBu8wFqdO3Grfl9vm8TrVYMDlas@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: 4qdGOGEuLtbUSlVMJa9D-tailv8
JNTP-ThreadID: O5CXkAcAe1D7_dx2s1eq7KbScfI
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 190@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=L6BMpB-hddUTlDOq9zDtcxNt6Fk@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 25 21:47:14 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/133.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0622b338f00df6c7e122ad5f6ee90645acf995aa"; logging-data="2025-02-25T21:47:14Z/9222054"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 2822
Lines: 31

Le 25/02/2025 à 21:38, Python a écrit :
> Le 25/02/2025 à 21:07, Richard Hachel a écrit :
>> Le 25/02/2025 à 18:21, Jim Burns a écrit :

>> For me, the definition must be extended to all powers of x such that i^x=-1.
> 
> This property is contradictory.

 Absolutely not.

 Tu n'as toujours pas compris (comme tu n'as toujours pas compris toutes 
les équations que j'ai données 
pour bonifier et rendre plus compréhensible la relativité restreinte). 

 This is not inserting a contradictory property, contradictory properties, 
in all my special relativity, I have knocked them out.
It is the complete opposite of my personality to propose contradictory 
properties.
On the contrary, it is a fantastic basic principle that is affirmed.
We extend the property of the imaginary number i to all powers of i. The 
definition of i is then clearly named, and given.
The imaginary number i is a very useful imaginary number to perform many 
operations and whose definition is the invariance of its nature whatever 
the power that we give it.
i^x=-1 whatever x. We see that i is the antithesis of 1.
It then becomes obvious that i^(1/2)=-1 and that i²=-1 as many say. But 
this is not enough if they believe that i²*i²=1.
Here, there is a bias, we use a real operation on an imaginary structure. 
We must set i²*i²=i^4=-1.
This is NOT contradictory. It is an intrinsic part of my (Nazi) ideology.

R.H.