Path: ...!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 00:10:32 +0000
Subject: Re: I asked ChatGPT to prove that the 1965 muon decay experiment WAS
 A HOAX.
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
References: <d97a7fc4404ee63309eee8f6033f7f04@www.novabbs.com>
 <4dfa305629c521e39d452ca6ebe4ec9d@www.novabbs.com>
 <36b5d976be33749a573d8d81a975c37f@www.novabbs.com>
 <7c44462b1a2aeed264106c23757765ab@www.novabbs.com>
 <5be4aeada7bf0cda8eaa47133d0089df@www.novabbs.com> <vv2p5m$53u0$2@solani.org>
 <7c6f29502df0e5f08fbd8bf4b8eb4bb3@www.novabbs.com> <vv71gt$76v2$1@solani.org>
 <5f2b1ffacf8e0fb15e7cb3bfcfaef363@www.novabbs.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2025 17:10:23 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5f2b1ffacf8e0fb15e7cb3bfcfaef363@www.novabbs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <LBOdnVwqM_hknIX1nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 47
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-ocxVDCLHapng1P7u8DZ4xSMcsIqbRwNnlGEn19IJyxP/YDuNYWoyLDRu5HzdO/ws8fX4d4bfcCaI6fu!arlGoEfdvNSnpdCv/4ybIoTP71bg1fbUJFzC704bH5Kkfq/s5C1HK7VZfNGIVBwrHKaxl2kn6XM=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3073

On 05/04/2025 04:37 PM, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:
> On Sun, 4 May 2025 6:29:49 +0000, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>> On 5/3/25 3:22 PM, ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog wrote:
>
>>> I used to enjoy chatting with you. Now I am merely sad.
>>
>>
>> Hmm.. If you have noticed such gradual change for the worse in his
>> understanding of physics, then I might have to review and update my
>> assessment that he is a high school drop out.
>>
>> If you are correct, then he may even have an advanced degree in physics
>> from years back.
>
> He was an electrical engineer, apparently a good one. He had worked
> his way up to a team lead and then a managerial position.
>
>> I rarely ever read something he posted (only very recently I've visited
>> relativity forum) so didn't have a chance to detect a gradual mental
>> decline in him.
>>
>> Now my question. How do you know it is not caused by, say, advanced
>> alcoholism or some other form of substance abuse?
>
> I don't know. But I would guess not.
>
>> Why are you comparing
>> his case to that of a person who's undergoing gradual "dementia."?
>
> He'd never slipped up on basic first-semester physics before.


You know why all inductive thinkers think alike?

Assume they don't, ....


The problem of induction usually follows, assume they do.




Anyways the very notion of "fictitious forces"
is a large waffling about the otherwise principled.