Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <LFybXY8pEHRiQ5TFfUOfERGJrew@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Einstein's Mistakes
References: <8110cafcb23c6f0f60d6414719aba934@www.novabbs.com> <vf86c7$1fueh$1@dont-email.me>
 <a2485088f7b96dd773e014a8809ff97b@www.novabbs.com> <x_xSO.2461785$VK2e.487693@fx01.ams4>
 <671abf29$0$525$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <vff77l$31lns$1@dont-email.me> <671ca629$1$11440$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
 <VEEsPfE0jSLHLIsdI6WRvMrDWaU@jntp> <Av-2NZAwpsB7fDsaDA3Xa7quTU8@jntp> <CM3Rh6KJhlMZg0bjJTcgAGseNcQ@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: TVT4FozlFMpwZTqJDd7DDhVJVLk
JNTP-ThreadID: 8110cafcb23c6f0f60d6414719aba934@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=LFybXY8pEHRiQ5TFfUOfERGJrew@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 24 12:28:02 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 10; K) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Mobile Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="6d50ac0b7088c5272a5b9c4d0bf30c7e7e05b422"; logging-data="2024-10-26T12:28:02Z/9075497"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <python@not-formail.invalid>
Bytes: 4048
Lines: 52

Le 26/10/2024 à 14:17, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
> Le 26/10/2024 à 13:47, Python a écrit :
>> Le 26/10/2024 à 13:35, M.D. Richard "Hachel" Lengrand  a écrit :
>>> ...
>>> If someone tells you "Doctor Hachel is perfectly ignorant in physics", weigh his 
>>> words on a scale, before swallowing them.
>> 
>> It is quite difficult to find anything more true that this statement.
> 
> By the way, you asked me to place the hyperplanes of simultaneity of Terrence 
> and Stella on a drawing.
> 
> I posted the two drawings for you.
> 
> This is unprecedented in the history of humanity, because no one draws 
> relationships as precise, as clear, and as beautiful as me, with horizontal 
> hyperplanes, as logic would require.
> 
> I then explained to you that for Stella, it was necessary to take into account 
> the change of inertial frame of reference, and to adapt it to her own 
> point-of-reference, that is to say her rocket, always at the origin of her frame 
> of reference (it is space that accelerates and deforms around her, but her own 
> rocket does not vary for her).
> 
> It is therefore necessary to take into account the space-zoom predicted by 
> Poincaré on the x-axis. Let D'=D.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)/(1+cosµ.Vo/c)

Poincaré never predicted such a stupidity. You are a liar.


> I then explained to you that in this example, there was a hint of reasoning 
> (like in chess the winning move that only Kasparov will find, here it is the good 
> doctor Hachel), and that to find the date on which Stella will receive her answer 
> (she sends her message at six years old and receives her answer at 14 years old, 
> on the way back), you have to use the diagram as follows.
> 
> <http://nemoweb.net/jntp?B_UDIY4o1RGc2Z3c3FLtDlnEdpg@jntp/Data.Media:1>
> 
> However, despite the beauty, clarity and logic of my relativistic thinking, it 
> would seem that you still haven't understood anything, like a few other morons 
> here, who don't understand anything about the theory of relativity, but spit on 
> Hachel.
> 
> All this is horribly stupid, tinged with jealousy and imbecilic narcissism.
> 
> We're just spitting for the sake of spitting.
> 
> 
> 
> R.H. (suivi sci.physics.relativity)

Both of your drawing are wrong. This one is the worse : it shows the light 
pulse to be in several places at the same time.