Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<LfCdnUwDHuYzT1D6nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 17:41:02 +0000
Subject: Re: The set of necessary FISONs
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vmo1bs$1rnl$1@dont-email.me> <vq58iu$1ftht$1@dont-email.me>
 <d56e87ef-bdf0-445d-acde-7ae362fffe31@att.net> <vq6lsb$1r4gi$1@dont-email.me>
 <8e7b322e-1259-4563-b2d5-37983249a397@att.net> <vq7lt1$1uvhg$2@dont-email.me>
 <4ae7b6d4-49a9-47ba-b2ac-c77238e93545@att.net> <vq953u$2bkek$1@dont-email.me>
 <b27c5730-4064-4342-aa68-ca4db75fad85@att.net> <vqafli$134ns$1@solani.org>
 <cb1e0570-cdb6-4dab-b5e7-ed37c1cb11dd@att.net> <vqbnrj$14etd$1@solani.org>
 <60614d74-cf15-4e8e-8390-f8861bff44f9@att.net> <vqckl7$31ocb$3@dont-email.me>
 <a00f5a07-ba19-4dab-9ab4-fae6f0a64533@att.net> <vqedua$3fbs8$1@dont-email.me>
 <e09bc504-743b-42ce-85a7-a815e76f9c26@att.net> <vqf5kn$3k3nm$1@dont-email.me>
 <76d99693-1dcf-4049-98b9-a33edced2e83@att.net> <vqh034$2b61$1@dont-email.me>
 <123fb080-4f72-482c-a6e9-aa525aa7150b@att.net> <vqhj2u$62sq$1@dont-email.me>
 <a847e169-4b24-4d5e-9acf-49941173e4e2@att.net> <vqjoi9$ltl6$1@dont-email.me>
 <00fb52fc-ca18-4166-90c7-71b5a66e2dda@att.net>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2025 10:41:05 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00fb52fc-ca18-4166-90c7-71b5a66e2dda@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <LfCdnUwDHuYzT1D6nZ2dnZfqnPsAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 119
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-uBHQTOlFA0V4xeww2EgDd1s7LOVnJbkfD5GCErLw6937mgiqMd/8Yje2DQrWrJOV9xbSdb14ZFs9Oat!+FY2NOD2fw3JTzomUiz7N6sRwYoMZnjtL1oIi7Yv1S1Wpl/bVLr0ZnDxjEKbL4tXP4NKcpgRSZ8=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 5478

On 03/09/2025 09:26 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 3/9/2025 5:55 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 08.03.2025 20:27, Jim Burns wrote:
>>> On 3/8/2025 9:09 AM, WM wrote:
>>>> On 08.03.2025 12:58, Jim Burns wrote:
>
>>>>> you should have said somewhere
>>>>> what a finite ordinal is,
>>>>
>>>> That is not under discussion here.
>>>
>>> That has been under discussion for decades.
>>>
>>> I think that these decades of discussion
>>> have been, in large part, you assigning
>>> different meanings to 'finite', etc.
>>> and matheologians (among whom I place myself)
>>> trying to discern what your meanings are.
>>>
>>> Here's my best guess:
>>> definableᵂᴹ  ==  finite
>
> Compare what you quote to what I wrote:
> definableᵂᴹ  ==  finiteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ  ==  #A<#Aᣕᵇ
>
>> [...]
>>
>>> darkᵂᴹ  ==  finite  ==  big
>
> Compare what you quote to what I wrote:
> darkᵂᴹ  ==  finiteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ  ==  big and #A<#Aᣕᵇ
> matheologicalᵂᴹ  ==  infiniteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ  ==  #A=#Aᣕᵇ
>
>> [...]
>>
>>>> n is usually denoting
>>>> a natural number.
>>>
>>> Do we mean the same by 'natural number'?
>>
>> There are two different meanings:
>> All positive integers having FISONs or all positive integers.
>
> The distinction which you (WM)
> have been dodging for decades
> is between
> sets which have
> fuller.by.one and emptier.by.one counterparts
> _which are a different size_ (finiteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ)
> and
> sets which have
> fuller.by.one and emptier.by.one counterparts
> _which are the same size_ (infiniteⁿᵒᵗᐧᵂᴹ)
>
>>>> FISONs are finite by definition.
>>>
>>> Do we mean the same by 'finite'?
>>
>> A natural number n is finite.
>> It is an integer between 0 and ω: 0 < n < ω.
>> Sometimes 0 is included, never ω is included.
>
> You erased the distinction I made and
> you haven't given any replacement.
> (Your ωᵂᴹ is merely a big finite.)
>
> #A size of set A
> #Aᣕᵇ size of fuller.by.one set, Aᣕᵇ = A∪{b} ≠ A
>
> #A < #Aᣕᵇ larger fuller.by.one set: A finite
>
> #Y = #Yᣕᶻ same.size fuller.by.one set: Y infinite
>
> The distinction infinite.v.finite is useful
> because
> not all sets are finite,
> and the distinction, for fuller.by.one sets,
> of same.v.different sizes leads to
> very different properties.
>
> A notable example of an infinite (ie, #Y = #Yᣕᶻ) set
> is the set of finite set.sizes {#A:#A<#Aᣕᵇ}
>
> ⎛ For each finite.set.size ξ in {#A:#A<#Aᣕᵇ},
> ⎜ there is a larger subset #{#A<ξ+1:#A<#Aᣕᵇ} = ξ+1
> ⎜
> ⎜ {#A:#A<#Aᣕᵇ} doesn't contain
> ⎜ a subset larger than {#A:#A<#Aᣕᵇ}
> ⎜
> ⎜ For each finite.set.size ξ in {#A:#A<#Aᣕᵇ},
> ⎝ ξ isn't the size of {#A:#A<#Aᣕᵇ}
>
> {#A:#A<#Aᣕᵇ} is what we mean by ℕ,
> what you mean by ℕ_def.
>
> ----
>>>> My description is definite.
>>>
>>> Your description is only definite because
>>> ℕ ∋ n is definite.
>>
>> No, my description is definite
>> because
>> every n can be obtained by addition of 1's
>> (or of curly brackets).
>
> Finitely.many 1's or curly.brackets.
> How many is that?
>
> Your decades.long argument has been about
> how many that is --
> but you avoid saying what you mean.
> You even avoid hearing what we mean.
>
>

Seems kind of futile doesn't it.