Article <Lo2dnQ1VTO-A_DD7nZ2dnZfqn

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<Lo2dnQ1VTO-A_DD7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.karotte.org!news.szaf.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: *Hemidactylus* <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Bitching: was some boasty header by JTEM
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 22:43:41 +0000
Organization: University of Ediacara
Lines: 76
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <Lo2dnQ1VTO-A_DD7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References: <v8ee5o$1p4vg$1@dont-email.me>
 <20240801191333.b10aa95d5e99ac57a749edb2@127.0.0.1>
 <r96cneGeuMWqfzb7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <644oajtv9e2df8463s27ijhstbf0lqu6o5@4ax.com>
 <areoaj5h0b2vlgriv60mttuq0546efieb5@4ax.com>
 <404qajlfehikvdhe8a9jierv07eq9bgbjk@4ax.com>
 <20240802184403.7bec77ea7cadf38ec7421e15@127.0.0.1>
 <toeqajhskinjm1kdt6ukvuorco9qcgd10q@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="49694"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O309nFECNS/s0WOhB/SdHgufosY=
Bytes: 5860

Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Aug 2024 18:44:03 +0100, the following appeared in
> talk.origins, posted by "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1>:
> 
>> On Fri, 02 Aug 2024 10:16:02 -0700
>> Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 21:59:30 -0400, the following appeared
>>> in talk.origins, posted by jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>>> On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 15:51:58 -0700, Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, 01 Aug 2024 19:29:59 +0000, the following appeared
>>>>> in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
>>>>> <ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Kerr-Mudd, John <admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 18:34:32 -0400
>>>>>>> JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Okay so this isn't new, I've been talking about this stuff for
>>>>>>>> years...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You love, erm, exotic fanciful "theories" that have, at best, a vague
>>>>>>> scientific basis. And you snip and swear at other posters. Why oh why do
>>>>>>> you think anyone at all would take you seriously? 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> </rhetorical question>, [stands back for abuse].
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> JTEM is a narcissistic crank best left ignored.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Agreed. I prefer the "auto-ignore" technique, but it tends
>>>>> to take a bit of heat  from flamewar aficionados, as well as
>>>>> from at least one semi-literate nutbar who referred to it as
>>>>> "censorship". Oy...
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> For someone who claims to prefer blinding yourself to what JTEM says,
>>>> you sure do have a lot to say about what JTEM says
>>>> 
>>> Do I? Cite to the multitudinous times I've had "a lot to
>>> say" about JTEM's rants, please.
>>>> 
>>>> , a tacit admission of willful ignorance.
>>>> 
>>> Refusing to listen to stupidity is not a vice.
>>>> 
>>>> Reminds me of another nutbar who regularly
>>>> brags about his killfile.
>>>> 
>>> Assuming you're referring to me, cite to those "regular
>>> brags", please. I've probably mentioned it around five or
>>> six times over the past couple of years, and only when it
>>> was relevant to the discussion.
>>> 
>>> You seem to have taken my first comment ("flamewar
>>> aficionado") personally, which indicates you correctly saw
>>> yourself in it; your current post ("blinding yourself",
>>> "willful ignorance", "nutbar") simply confirms that
>>> assessment. You will not, of course, drag me in again.
>>> 
>>> The second clause, of course, referred to a long-gone nutbar
>>> named, IIRC, Schafley.
>>>> 
>> 
>> Please don't feed the troll(s)
>> 
> I have most of them in my Special Children File. But this
> one isn't a troll in the classic sense.
>
Jillery isn’t a troll and has provided some good, knowledgable, on topic
posts here over the years. Easily triggered so maybe it is better practice
not to poke the bear. Mutual forbearance (forgive the pun).