Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <MA4OOYES0-uaSZYAgMFrpjEmKmM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Incorrect mathematical integration
References: <EKV4LWfwyF4mvRIpW8X1iiirzQk@jntp> <v7h59v$3mabh$1@dont-email.me> <UqTpLIJxvD4VcXT01kWm7g9OGtU@jntp>
 <v7jnc7$7jpq$1@dont-email.me> <KRDL-sfeKg0KUbMuUiMzTEhYDwk@jntp> <v7mc8d$pmhs$1@dont-email.me>
 <9w4qQAYIGHNeJtHg4ZR1m_Ooxo4@jntp> <v7p7bu$1cd5m$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: MJVwDFv4SkmL1d0ZJQp8mlmoF04
JNTP-ThreadID: Ptg0buW51I-Cbbzx-mVW15r6pQg
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=MA4OOYES0-uaSZYAgMFrpjEmKmM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 24 22:06:46 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-23T22:06:46Z/8961838"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 2134
Lines: 14

Le 23/07/2024 à 23:29, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> Den 22.07.2024 23:37, skrev Richard Hachel:

> When calculating velocities the distance and time must be measured
> in the same frame of reference.
> The distance in one frame and the time in another frame is not
> a speed of anything if the frames are moving relative to each other.

I know it may seem very strange (relativistic physics is a bit strange but 
unavoidable) but that's how it happens.
It is the observing frame of reference that has the right distance, but it 
is the particle or rocket that has the right time.
Observable time being only an anisochronous illusion.

R.H.