Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<MNWcnWmZlO4r_pb7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 01:47:34 +0000 From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: [OT] Is English just badly pronounced French? References: <uuamee$21vr1$1@solani.org> <uucan5$22pjt$1@solani.org> <uucbc4$1uths$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-3DD3B5.13123831032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <uuchor$20akk$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS Message-ID: <MNWcnWmZlO4r_pb7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 01:47:34 +0000 Lines: 51 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-xX0yutbtMda4PBaBniYCwNozayZ9ROs/OkXF554YtQSl6kdSX94Wl6GIfRoKwbup5Z41gEj4YLk8N57!hZviThlKuM4NGjjIiiJov0hsvBpTVTMqTsxY5EVhaQCASLF/FURUIGbTYpCCtJfIpuCrqo6Eut1W X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3229 On Mar 31, 2024 at 1:40:59 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: > BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/31/2024 10:56 AM, Rhino wrote: >>>>> Sun, 31 Mar 2024 06:35:33 -0700 suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com>: > >>>>>>> . . . > >>>>>> While GB officially went metric, many people still use the Imperial >>>>>> measurements, at least for linear measures, not so much for weight. > >>>>> The Brits weigh themselves in "stones" not pounds or kilograms. (I >>>>> believe a stone is 14 pounds.) These stones are definitely not metric >>>>> but I'm not sure they can truly be called Imperial either since they >>>>> aren't used anywhere outside the UK, as far as I know. > >>>> Yeah, I don't know where stone comes from. I was thinking smaller, like >>>> pounds and ounces. > >>> These were literal stones of a uniform weight used in trade, and >>> depending on the trade good, varied from 6 pounds to 21 pounds. They >>> would have been used on a balance scale. > >> Is there somewhere in the British government where the official >> reference stones are kept? The ones on which all official measurements >> are based? > > Not till 1878 when they came up with a stable object made of platinum. I > think it had to be kept in a vacuum but I haven't read about it in a > long time. > > Centuries ealier, they wouldn't have had the technical precision to have > a reference weight. > >> Kind of like the Zero Milestone which stands on the Ellipse, just >> outside the south fenceline of the White House. It's the point from >> which all official road distances in the United States are measured. > > Interesting. https://ibb.co/mqbv1KG https://ibb.co/nsYbWQM > For navigation, the Washington Naval Observatory was proposed as the > origin of the longitude, but it's Greenwich because the British had far > more navigation maps, and nobody wanted it to be Paris except the French.