Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<MNWcnWmZlO4r_pb7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 01:47:34 +0000
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] Is English just badly pronounced French?
References: <uuamee$21vr1$1@solani.org> <uucan5$22pjt$1@solani.org> <uucbc4$1uths$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-3DD3B5.13123831032024@69.muaa.rchm.washdctt.dsl.att.net> <uuchor$20akk$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Message-ID: <MNWcnWmZlO4r_pb7nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 01:47:34 +0000
Lines: 51
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-xX0yutbtMda4PBaBniYCwNozayZ9ROs/OkXF554YtQSl6kdSX94Wl6GIfRoKwbup5Z41gEj4YLk8N57!hZviThlKuM4NGjjIiiJov0hsvBpTVTMqTsxY5EVhaQCASLF/FURUIGbTYpCCtJfIpuCrqo6Eut1W
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3229

On Mar 31, 2024 at 1:40:59 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>> Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>>> suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote:
>>>> On 3/31/2024 10:56 AM, Rhino wrote:
>>>>> Sun, 31 Mar 2024 06:35:33 -0700 suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com>:
> 
>>>>>>> . . . 
> 
>>>>>> While GB officially went metric, many people still use the Imperial
>>>>>> measurements, at least for linear measures, not so much for weight.
> 
>>>>> The Brits weigh themselves in "stones" not pounds or kilograms. (I
>>>>> believe a stone is 14 pounds.) These stones are definitely not metric
>>>>> but I'm not sure they can truly be called Imperial either since they
>>>>> aren't used anywhere outside the UK, as far as I know.
> 
>>>> Yeah, I don't know where stone comes from. I was thinking smaller, like 
>>>> pounds and ounces.
> 
>>> These were literal stones of a uniform weight used in trade, and
>>> depending on the trade good, varied from 6 pounds to 21 pounds. They
>>> would have been used on a balance scale.
> 
>> Is there somewhere in the British government where the official 
>> reference stones are kept? The ones on which all official measurements 
>> are based?
> 
> Not till 1878 when they came up with a stable object made of platinum. I
> think it had to be kept in a vacuum but I haven't read about it in a
> long time.
> 
> Centuries ealier, they wouldn't have had the technical precision to have
> a reference weight.
> 
>> Kind of like the Zero Milestone which stands on the Ellipse, just 
>> outside the south fenceline of the White House. It's the point from 
>> which all official road distances in the United States are measured.
> 
> Interesting.

https://ibb.co/mqbv1KG

https://ibb.co/nsYbWQM

> For navigation, the Washington Naval Observatory was proposed as the
> origin of the longitude, but it's Greenwich because the British had far
> more navigation maps, and nobody wanted it to be Paris except the French.