| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<MPG.40ef79b748ef91ee989d40@news.individual.net> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Janet <nobody@home.com>
Newsgroups: sci.lang,alt.usage.english
Subject: Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2024 16:08:08 +0100
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <MPG.40ef79b748ef91ee989d40@news.individual.net>
References: <v5t8mv$tk1f$1@dont-email.me> <v5tgf1$ukmm$1@dont-email.me> <MPG.40ecaac62ee523e7989d38@news.individual.net> <v5uo3h$15s3r$1@dont-email.me> <1qw1d8o.1r7d3jr1yb8l8eN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <v5vdu6$19tmo$1@dont-email.me> <5b7a073093charles@candehope.me.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net m7Rp7hEXejUjFvwaFDFclghwXvua/7evQaXzI/UaoFyyAO7E7j
Cancel-Lock: sha1:5lwGZNijshHkINsxSZ5zrsyTtdA= sha256:/TgFOjozWnmiSD7lfChDklLd5fFdzCey+VyMploMZYE=
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
Bytes: 2282
In article <5b7a073093charles@candehope.me.uk>,
charles@candehope.me.uk says...
> Subject: Re: "a Pair of Panties" ?????
> From: charles <charles@candehope.me.uk>
> Newsgroups: sci.lang, alt.usage.english
>
> In article <v5vdu6$19tmo$1@dont-email.me>,
> Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:
> > On 02/07/24 06:47, Sn!pe wrote:
> > > Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Le 01/07/2024 à 13:00, Janet a écrit :
> > >>> In article <v5tgf1$ukmm$1@dont-email.me>, vpaereru-
> > >>> unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid says...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I observe that the kilt is singular - two legs, but only one
> > >>>> hole.
> > >>>
> > >>> Like the skirt, the dress, the petticoat.
> > >>>
> > >>> It's a mystery why men don't wear a petticoat under those itchy
> > >>> wool kilts.
> > >>
> > >> In truth, I don't know what Scotsmen wear under their kilts, and I
> > >> shrink from enquiring.
>
> > Kilts strike me as particularly unsuited to the Scottish climate. A cold
> > wind up the kilt would make anyone shrink.
>
> It's a 20th Century falacy that no underwear is worn under a kilt. It stems
> from the War Office, in WW1, gforgetting to put underpants on their uniform
> list. Think about hygene.
>
Think about "going Commando"
Janet.