Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<MPG.42e964643dfc668f34c@news.individual.net>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Janet <nobody@home.com>
Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
Subject: Re: Friday Night Vittles? 7/11/2025
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 10:04:09 +0100
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <MPG.42e964643dfc668f34c@news.individual.net>
References: <104rtlu$1mlt6$1@dont-email.me> <89cb5a819c925d34751cd21086e7d45f@www.novabbs.org> <qFfcQ.431196$W5Jb.242536@fx09.iad> <mde0ihFno55U3@mid.individual.net> <104sieb$1udhb$1@dont-email.me> <mde9rpFpgmcU2@mid.individual.net> <1wtcQ.72256$1c77.29043@fx04.iad> <6872d078$2$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <104v0iv$2dmas$4@dont-email.me> <mdm2v0F45n0U2@mid.individual.net> <1054l2q$3sppd$1@dont-email.me> <mdmp2cF7pifU1@mid.individual.net> <1055bbn$1cvv$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net ijlE5g+Eac9nofdkkhKBaA6ZFSX6FMVqsPZUGRv86L8vYCtRra
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KFQwuXfF0oaFQM2quiv4RmhvuEg= sha256:0uNjB4zNjKFJ2pQlj+CPCJAyOmXusyFq5vhpmAIvflE=
User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4

In article <1055bbn$1cvv$1@dont-email.me>, 
Bruce@invalid.invalid says...
> 
> On 15 Jul 2025 10:32:44 GMT, Leonard Blaisdell
> <leoblaisdell@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> 
> >On 2025-07-15, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> >
> >> The kids could also come home to dad, especially if mom's able to get
> >> a better job than dad.
> >
> >I won't argue with that. A kid could come home to a parent.
> 
> I'd want that too if I was a parent, one way or the other.
> 
> >> And when you say Zeitgeist, I guess you're referring to Trump. You
> >> know, that guy who suddenly doesn't want to release the Epstein files.
> >> One wonders why... Oh well, Zeitgeist!
> >
> >You are from the country closest to Zeitgeist. Don't you know what it
> >means? 
> 
> I do.
> 
> >FWIW, I was uncomfortable with his Epstein answer, a couple of
> >days ago. That won't go away from either side. I want answers, regardless
> >of who it sinks, or a logical explanation.
> 
> I agree. Also if it sinks Clinton or Gates or Prince Andrew.

  Prince Andrew is thoroughly sunk below the waves.. 
royally punished and humiliated by his own family.

  Janet UK