Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <MZ-3-Ki6l-hJvQNpXF6G0CD2OLo@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: the notion of counter-intuitiveness in relativistic physics
References: <GBEGTHyJnMpjHuJ0IoZO0OLSc1M@jntp> <AE2L2lzGJn13Z_4dg3bpJC59QsA@jntp> <66b3d79f$0$3656$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
 <dlVAS4dgp1D4i_LVHm3d5U9hqow@jntp> <43ee5c178f7ae877c0c3e00e77386494@www.novabbs.com> <xHQxwI0qFFk4RXIOP_V9qQEYF6o@jntp>
 <03be6498d21bfde3edbac3669f10841c@www.novabbs.com> <17ea67a48e5596d2$254537$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <df7a10a82cd895126e0d5ceafa835a8f@www.novabbs.com> <v983k7$mn9k$2@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: 5onHS5fG9UK29oWRMDnQdZP_0ZE
JNTP-ThreadID: azmKI4HvnEJnqvnVFsjpWB8pljI
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=MZ-3-Ki6l-hJvQNpXF6G0CD2OLo@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 24 16:26:56 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/127.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-08-10T16:26:56Z/8982012"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From:  Richard Hachel   <r.hachel@jesauspu.fr>
Bytes: 2967
Lines: 35

Le 10/08/2024 à 18:14, Python a écrit :
> Le 10/08/2024 à 18:09, gharnagel a écrit :
>> On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 15:29:23 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>>>
>>> W dniu 10.08.2024 o 15:02, gharnagel pisze:
>>> >
>>> > At first, Einstein was ignored, and it took quite a while for
>>> > the PTB to come around.  But it didn't happen until experimental
>>> > evidence prevailed.
>>>
>>> Only such an idiot believe these nonsensical
>>> ideological lies, Harrie, and the mumble of
>>> the idiot was not even consistent.
>> 
>> Wozzie has told so many lies, he can't discern truth from his
>> outrageous fantasies :-))
> 
> It is actually not a lie if he really believes his fallacious claims
> to be true.
> 
> IMHO he is demented and dumb enough to actually believe his unsound
> "arguments".

Ah, te voilà, toi?

Je te croyais disparu sous la claque que tu t'es prise, et qui portait sur 
Nostradamus.

Je t'ai demandé d'expliquer le quatrain (ce que j'ai fait, et qui n'a 
rien à voir avec tes conneries de Louis XIV) et de me montrer si, avec 
tes immenses talents d'historiens ou de critique, tu pouvais me prouver 
que cela avait été écris avant 1660. 

Magnes toi un peu les couilles, au lieu de faire le con sur usenet.

R.H.