Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<N5mdnfwMRvLrAHH6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 02:14:14 +0000
Subject: Re: Rewriting SSA. Is This A Chance For GNU/Linux?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
References: <pan$54963$b3f3d4e6$ae35ff46$71fe05c9@linux.rocks>
 <gXCdnTD2YLRBaHX6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <m4tf1dFmvh3U1@mid.individual.net> <vsd0ui$365s0$1@dont-email.me>
 <JHudnUVvuNc823f6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <d41lujt571qvs8ksloa7q084fi7e7p7hnk@4ax.com> <vsgsgn$36mma$5@dont-email.me>
 <vsgtsq$3be4i$1@dont-email.me> <m52mefFi3nfU4@mid.individual.net>
 <vshetb$3shon$1@dont-email.me>
From: c186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 22:14:12 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vshetb$3shon$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <N5mdnfwMRvLrAHH6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 22
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-761zNRan/V1UfaJRHQzQjpfi4/cFHHEd4Ywj5PW3UO7RlK2m3S1bYrlXF2+ciBouT6fDmDib198mimO!HjcZCgzy0ms4lWXf6pr9sZHz6YMdo/2+LlDY5C6Tcat6rZXYlfam/aEKIWYU1tYF2Q+u/mohI5Wg
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2415

On 4/1/25 3:30 PM, Robert Heller wrote:
> Yes, one of the things I did when I was working at UMass was to convert some
> FORTRAN code to C and yes, automated tool commonly did either a poor job or
> created code that was not maintainable or readable.  (And some of the code
> needed to be made multi-threaded for parallelization.)

   You're pretty much right.

   Note also that the 'COBOL' all those old apps
   were written in were often kinda custom for
   ONE kind of antique box. NOT GNU "COBOL".

   Any re-writes ... use PYTHON. Yep, a lot of
   people will hate me for saying that but there
   are several good reasons.

   Alas it will have to be done line by line,
   by competent HUMANS.

   Note that old COBOL code has probably been
   rudely patched and tweaked over and over and
   over since 1965 ...... MESS !!!