Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <NJuSuqDy0JPTakkJauWYlZVmOr8@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <181a5eb81e767dc4$86737$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <HPF6j-4BEHrZMeoOSNYRAHyP3Tw@jntp> <181a6036c3d29170$90809$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <K1sjSIRidGRyhD2K8Ndavvy6DFs@jntp> <181a63878c3a598f$86738$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <jifh8z9kBXJpfBLJBNHCj0M6zfo@jntp> <181a8ab40daa2f3b$84542$1308629$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
 <8kbiEMBjBP64SDxCqmK9hPf8iW8@jntp> <181a97a8cae7837c$86741$1324994$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: cuUaN9foSBV-mRdwiq01mH_X3Mg
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=NJuSuqDy0JPTakkJauWYlZVmOr8@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 25 15:14:51 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="cdcf91e3472b50c760e8dcbe4a2750ed9830a543"; logging-data="2025-01-14T15:14:51Z/9174559"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 6642
Lines: 133

Le 14/01/2025 à 16:09, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 13:16, Python pisze:
>> Le 14/01/2025 à 12:11, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 14.01.2025 o 11:23, Python pisze:
>>>> Le 14/01/2025 à 00:14, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 23:14, Python pisze:
>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 23:13, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:58, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:45, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 22:40, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 22:33, Demented maniac, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:50, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 20:47, Idiotic kook Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> W dniu 13.01.2025 o 20:31, Python pisze:
>>>>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein deserved the Nobel Prize for *numerous* reasons:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Whatever you say - Poincare had enough wit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to understand how idiotic rejecting Euclid
>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be, and he has written it clearly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> enough for anyone able to read 
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Even you admitted that Poincaré would likely have kicked you 
>>>>>>>>>>>> in the a** 
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Wozniak.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, I didn't. A lie as usual.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You did. Amnesia now?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, I didn't As you insist - maybe it's
>>>>>>>>> rather a delusion than a lie. Woll, both
>>>>>>>>> very possible.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyway you did.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope. As said - either a lie or a delusion.
>>>>>>> Both typical for a relativistic idiot in general
>>>>>>> and for you especially.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> See,  - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
>>>>>>>>>>> guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is nothing to do as you've never done anything like.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, I did, I've pointed directly 2 denying
>>>>>>>>> themself predictions of his,  physics.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You didn't, they're laughable nonsense.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course they are, they're consequences
>>>>>>> of the physics of your idiot guru.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Only you were screaming. You got precise refutations of you silly 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope, I've got some utterly ridiculous
>>>>>>> assertions, extremly stupid even considering
>>>>>>> the usual level of the Shit's worshippers.
>>>>>>> Well,  nothing more was ever expected, of
>>>>>>> course. It's changing nothing, the mumble
>>>>>>> of your idiot guru was not even consistent,
>>>>>>> it's been proven and a fanatic piece of shit
>>>>>>> screaming "NOOOOO!!!" spitting and slandering is
>>>>>>> changing nothing. Sorry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If it were a proof how come nobody but you recognizes it as such?
>>>>>
>>>>> Nobody is expecting a bunch of
>>>>> fanatic idiots to recognize and accept
>>>>> a proof that their divine guru was just
>>>>> a mumbling crazie.
>>>>> Expecting something like that from
>>>>> a bunch of brainwashed fanatics wouldn't
>>>>> be wise, would it?
>>>>
>>>> A proof is a human production, right? As long as an alleged one is 
>>>> not considered valid by a significant community outside of its author 
>>>> it is not a proof.
>>>
>>> Sorry, poor stinker - pointing 2 denying
>>> themself predictions of the physics of
>>> your idiot guru is a proof of its inconsistency.
>>> No matter whether you and your fellow trash
>>> are accepting it or not.
>>>
>>>
>>>> You can insult people, it doesn't change the fact that what you have 
>>>> nothing like a proof.
>>>
>>> You can insult people, it doesn't change the
>>> fact that I've pointed directly 2 denying
>>> themself predictions of the physics of your
>>> idiot guru. I.e - I've demonstrated a proof
>>> of its inconsistency.
>>> Now - go fuck yourself with your pseudophilosophy.
>>> It's as worthless as The Shit of your idiot guru.
>> 
>> Just because *you* say so? Come on!
> 
> 
> Because I've pointed directly 2 denying
> themself predictions of the physics of
> your idiot guru - and the ONLY answer
> from you and your fellow idiots is
> just some mad ravings.
> Not that it's any surprise considering
> who you are and what your church is.
> 
> 
>> You have demonstrated nothing.
> 
> Just because *you* say so? Come on, poor
> stinker.
> 
>> And are just a demented ranting kook lost in the middle of nowhere.
> 
> 
> See, poor stinker - I've proven the mumble of your idiot
> guru to be inconsistent, and you can do nothing about it
> apart of spitting, insulting and slandering.
> And you're just doing what you can for your beloved
> Shit and your beloved church.

Again, how come you are incapable of convincing ANYONE neither here nor 
elsewhere that your rant is a proper proof of anything?