Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2024 18:38:00 +0000
Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality (ubiquitous ordinals)
Newsgroups: sci.logic,sci.math
References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp>
 <Yz6dnZrQj9Lf3zX7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <305754ad-bf86-44e7-95a5-f6059b8869da@att.net>
 <78CcnZMbf6XDzjT7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <ef6e9a26-4899-41a5-ade7-5ab5a3d654d0@att.net>
 <SIacnYBQM_GoSjf7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <e712953f-f3a3-46bf-92e6-aea33f08cfd7@att.net>
 <g96dneARJ9dDfDb7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <41684a87-685c-446c-87ce-ce2f5fdfbd4d@att.net>
 <h5KcnXrG7N1VsDH7nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v8id14$2pfk1$1@dont-email.me>
 <Ah2cnYogF_UTpDD7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <b6133d70-75cc-4ad0-8755-dfa6bf9241cd@att.net>
 <a4KcnZKcpJT1STP7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <75fe3de0-9922-4a6e-8a4a-1df25bbc5cbc@att.net>
 <NPKcnRCEu-sTZzP7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <fa7974b3-69a6-4535-b227-1e69eb37bd87@att.net>
 <dkOdnTOBra4uDDL7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <99c651b2-13f9-416e-bcf4-3f94f0768c7a@att.net>
 <LPGcnWd5wLFUIDL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <0112d06f-136d-4623-8fc6-c2a7f4635f4c@att.net>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2024 11:38:51 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0112d06f-136d-4623-8fc6-c2a7f4635f4c@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <O6mcneOpH6wVVzL7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 67
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-aRVpChxdlr0SKRF1ZnuJT7U9k7bvQS4lNkm7ZLU0XysRd+Re+68BMUO4MwWyIwxE1EA1NEbO9tq3aNv!hV4+mdSUGwY2+t0hkAECB7cRZ4WXU363KPGwmaakwfbW6IgzR8az0Rx0bICVi3g8/NpNFeb8wiSM
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4417

On 08/04/2024 11:26 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 8/4/2024 1:44 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 08/04/2024 09:48 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
>>> On 8/4/2024 10:36 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>> On 08/03/2024 10:25 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
>>>>> On 8/3/2024 11:51 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>>>>> On 08/03/2024 08:45 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
>
>>>>>>> What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What can you think it means.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your rhetoric suggests that
>>>>> _you_ don't have something in mind for the term
>>>>> _you_ introduced,
>>>>> and you'd like someone else to provide something
>>>>> to have in mind. Please prove me wrong.
>>>>> What does 'comprehension' mean where there are no sets?
>>>>> Specifically,
>>>>> what does 'expansion of comprehension' mean
>>>>> in the context of
>>>>> "geometry, axiomatic geometry or Euclid's"?
>>>>
>>>> No, "what can you think", it means.
>>>> Usually it just means "construction".
>>>
>>> Okay. Then you did answer my question.
>>> "Comprehension", "construction" and "what can you think"
>>> each seem to me very different from the other two.
>>> I will let you carry on doing what it is you are doing.
>>
>> I don't need your help nor permission, thanks.
>
> I didn't offer help or permission.
>
> You are using English words in a manner which
> I don't follow, and,
> not to brag, but
> I've been speaking English for a really, really long time.
> Thus, I'm going to stop trying to follow your use.
> My comment was intended to be read as <wave bye bye>.
>
>> And it's rather presumptious of you to not
>> make what is equi-interpretable to be equi-interpretable.
>>
>> Jaded, say, biased, willfully ignorant, hypocritical, ...,
>> "wrong".
>
> It is not wrong, when talking about certain things,
> to not.be.talking about other things.
> It is not wrong, it is not possible to do otherwise.
>
> There is no pair of integers in the ratio of √2
>
> To say that
> there are pairs of reals in the ratio of √2
> does not argue against the first claim,
> because they are claims about different things.
>
> To pretend that it argues against the first claim
> is wrong.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
>
>

Numbers