Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<OTa5i9cjTkRi5ASnO0wLkGkS3d8@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <OTa5i9cjTkRi5ASnO0wLkGkS3d8@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: The truth about the Lorentz Transformation. References: <152fdece6d8ad07399662b8718f94e75@www.novabbs.com> <vcb6pi$3cfv6$1@dont-email.me> <7929553fdddeb12b78821749abdfc4b9@www.novabbs.com> <vcgp47$gqdr$1@dont-email.me> <55a4900d1e16c66d45224f9b5c0ba481@www.novabbs.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: GsxrbfDzTCZ5hMZtEQ1TUFHX_4A JNTP-ThreadID: 152fdece6d8ad07399662b8718f94e75@www.novabbs.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=OTa5i9cjTkRi5ASnO0wLkGkS3d8@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Fri, 20 Sep 24 08:00:05 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-09-20T08:00:05Z/9029150"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid> Bytes: 2028 Lines: 17 Le 20/09/2024 à 04:57, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit : > Mikko: No, I don't accept the ether. That's why I would be a fool to use > the LT. Our universe has no ether. But there is no need for the ether for Poincaré-Lorentz transformations. Poincaré-Lorentz transformations are of great mathematical beauty and obvious physical reality. Why do you want to give up, or not believe in these transformations? It is as if you were saying: "There is no pink unicorn, so I do not believe that 2+2 equals 4." Your reasoning has no substance. R.H.