Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<Os-dneM2WMXSe-v7nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:57:19 +0000 Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com> <6675e44b$0$11435$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <889a627cf8f9e25caffcfb2e7c1b83bd@www.novabbs.com> <667698ae$1$3329$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <Os-dneA2WMUMeOv7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:57:19 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <Os-dneA2WMUMeOv7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <Os-dneM2WMXSe-v7nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@giganews.com> Lines: 27 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-6lYXS3Avp2qjCDYPp2f25hkcsc9paAYtULoRKg4RvV2DkD/OAfNIpXAY6fcwuHjY+cI4zXeTGk7j1Rm!BHeOL7e7z/JN/f3Oa4BaN7+aDqU1nCy85InUxHs058EqFC/dWSDrGZX3CuiS8vgwIlCmyvzRica3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2229 On 06/22/2024 07:54 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 06/22/2024 02:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote: >> >>> The formula uses the speed of light for the force of gravity, employing >>> an electromagnetic assumption shared by Gerber and Einstein, among other >>> electromagnetic formulas used by both. >> >> More nonsense. >> The speed of light equals 1 >> and it doesn't appear in any formula of physics, >> (in the right units) >> >> Jan >> > > That's in a mathematics with only numbers between 0 and 1, though. > > Or, "only numbers only between only 0 and only 1". > I.e., instead of "natural units" it's "normalized, standardized, clamped, bounded, ..., 'simple', 'natural' units". Vis-a-vis "1 AMU" or "1 AU" or "1 Ampere".