Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<Os-dneY2WMWkeOv7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 14:52:41 +0000 Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails. Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com> <6675e44b$0$11435$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <30afac2dd572fd4a163ff412d969e17d@www.novabbs.com> <667698af$0$3329$426a74cc@news.free.fr> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 07:52:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <667698af$0$3329$426a74cc@news.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <Os-dneY2WMWkeOv7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 58 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-vTrz2UVy1DfjIVxuNZ274JGezrzVQNXcATHXJXeeIOYox+x1hOSTNBh7P8am+8udaiuWpuU4OyHtwrh!PXZ4Eo1AQcd3Dhs+v7cKja6yEU6MKtdM/p9727PoTHPXgsdHH/YpPcdEAkuTmedsFuJde27PJfGv X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3503 On 06/22/2024 02:26 AM, J. J. Lodder wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote: > >> It will take more than vacuous denials if you want to be convincing. >> Try this: >> "FRAMING HYPOTHESES: Conceptions of gravity in the 18th and 19th >> centuries" >> Frans van Lunteren c.1991 > > In the 18th century they already knew > that gravity is caused > by the accumulation of phlogiston. > > See: "Flogiston en andere nieuwlichterij" (Frans van Lunteren) > <https://dwc.knaw.nl/column-flogiston-en-andere-nieuwlichterij-frans-van-lunteren/> > for an up to date reference, > (learn Dutch first to keep you busy) > > Jan > Dutch has been kind of passe since Stevin, though there's something to be said for the Scheveningen conference for relativity as much as the Copenhagen conference for QM, and t'Hooft of course is pretty great, yet otherwise the clogs and the dykes and the ice-skating and the wind-mills, has that phlogiston is Greek and gets into the vis-viva versus the vis-motrix. At Scheveningen in the '80's for Relativity Theory was a great conference, about the Bianchi and Regge and Ricci and Backlund, tensor-wise, it's usually enough modern today, with beyond the Hamiltonian working up the Hamiltonian-Jacobian about the Lagrangians. Anyways though the Lesage theory has that most people who know have it as very sensible, yet as with regards to the ideas of the total usual and the Mach-ian, then about keeping inertia real. So, "gravitons" reflect mostly the atom, or for "matter is never destroyed", then for some its "Big Higgs", then for others, "Little Higgs", as with regards to "ultramundane corpuscles of a Lesage-ian shadow gravity, or fall gravity". Energy as conserved is reasonable, though, it's always of a form. None of matter, charge, light's speed, proton/electron neutron lifetime, is "first fundamental", as with regards to that each are, overall. "Energy: four quantities." Unifying field theory, the fields of the forces, is for a sum-of-histories sum-of-potentials, putting the nuclear force together with fall gravity.