Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <PFhIpzW_CY6k7-NpFFWxQ6U3-eM@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Newton: Photon falling from h meters increase its energy.
References: <4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com> <17a125a3e75f42ff91ef08afdab4e0a9@www.novabbs.com>
 <1819b79e1aa58c97$89507$1329657$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <9e55d347a16ad439d5b2e75440ae1a6d@www.novabbs.com>
 <6782d853$0$28064$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <c2fdc44dd6b77812b78bd871c9bde8f3@www.novabbs.com>
 <4404fd8d88a2eacd658d92efeef4d6c2@www.novabbs.com> <UjtKffdj34rh4B-JrKumzbeGtnc@jntp> <Z5JtI3c-5JMvtNLf7dMsy-PULgc@jntp>
 <qLtiG5g8NZm1g-FnNGAZjmL-3pA@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: bHTeOnCrCwIbgICkacWhouznsV4
JNTP-ThreadID: 4af374770bb67b6951ef19c75b35fbad@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=PFhIpzW_CY6k7-NpFFWxQ6U3-eM@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 25 19:31:35 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="7a1acdfaa03ceae2fcc39113260f3e5d01945461"; logging-data="2025-01-13T19:31:35Z/9173755"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 4734
Lines: 62

Le 13/01/2025 à 20:20, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
> Le 13/01/2025 à 18:08, Python a écrit :
>> Le 13/01/2025 à 16:06, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
>>> Le 13/01/2025 à 06:07, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit :
>>>> On Sun, 12 Jan 2025 1:31:59 +0000, rhertz wrote:
>>> 
>>>> And Einstein used a refraction formula to double the deflection=
>>>> "photographic plates? Poor did, and he completely repudiated the
>>>> findings of Eddington. This should have given pause to any ethical
>>>> scientist.
>>>> Here are some quotes from Poor's summary: "The mathematical
>>>> formula, by which Einstein calculated his deflection of 1.75
>>>> seconds for light rays passing the edge of the sun, is a well known
>>>> and simple formula of physical optics"; "Not a single one of the
>>>> fundamental concepts of varying time, or warped or twisted space,
>>>> of simultaneity, or of the relativity of motion is in any way involved
>>>> in Einstein's prediction of, or formulas for, the deflection of light";
>>>> "The many and elaborate eclipse expeditions have, therefore,
>>>> been given a fictitious importance. Their results can neither prove
>>>> nor disprove the relativity theory" (emphasis added) (Poor, 1930)." -
>>>> saved pdf = "Albert Einsetin, Plagiarist of the Century" p.9
>>> 
>>> Einstein is an artificial media creation. Like Emmanuel Macron or Greta 
>>> Thunberg. No more.
>> 
>> This is a idiotic statement that only shows your own stupidity.
> 
> Python, you are a hypocrite..
> 
> You are not going to make me believe that you do not know these things.
> 
> You have read a lot about Einstein in relativist forums for decades. So you must 
> know what his beginnings are, where and how they were made, how he was awarded a 
> Nobel Prize and then how he was photographed everywhere in the world press. It was 
> obviously a voluntary creation. It is a shame that we can "doubt" it.

Everything you claimed about Einstein's Nobel Prize are lies. Plain lies. 
Shameful disgusting lies.

Einstein deserved the Nobel Prize for *numerous* reasons: 

- Study of the brownian motion, confirming atomic theory
- Explanation of the photoelectric effect [this was picked by the Nobel 
committee because the prize is supposed to focus on applied physics and 
Relativity didn't get much experimental confirmations *yet*] 
- Determination of molecules sizes
- And of course : Special Relativity and General Relatity

All of this in a single year, while it took you decades to claim that 2 + 
2 can be 5 for some observers... You are a disgrace for Humanity, M.D. 
Richard "Hachel" Lengrand.

The shame is on your side, Lengrand. You are a fraud.

I have read a lot, right, far more than you did. And contrarily to you I 
did understand what I've read.

So I know that your claims are nonsense and illustrate your stupidity. You 
are the damned hypocrite here.

> [snip more nonsense, off-topic btw]