Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<Puicnd3LWNDvi-f6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 05:19:46 +0000
Subject: Re: Anyone having trouble with sleep?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
References: <vlbl7m$gkhb$1@dont-email.me>
 <wwvbjwm1phq.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <ltu3ubFqm2tU6@mid.individual.net>
From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
Organization: wokiesux
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:19:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ltu3ubFqm2tU6@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <Puicnd3LWNDvi-f6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Lines: 39
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97
X-Trace: sv3-zCbjF57btaa2INvWKa1OtUw4+bCNYo0OIAJEr1IMF/9VJUsfPdlx3gXxvS0PZW/P6N2UxjE1RipATa9!YFCaR2wPbLJq6SJqxCvo+Fqc0OBwGdUQju9jLIj+lqBwBXMf02bMsZnomxFPRhQUYcoAP6sAIwkf!dN4zd0FJ2N1Ahp6hwx5g
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3048

On 1/4/25 8:00 PM, rbowman wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Jan 2025 17:02:41 +0000, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
> 
>> My partner’s computer has a similar issue. Based on some reading around
>> the subject the kernel is crashing, most likely in some driver, while
>> putting the computer to sleep.
> 
> To further complicate things my Windows 11 laptop doesn't do sleep well if
> a WSL instance is running. I've got the feeling it's related to turning
> off the display. I may have the wrong terminology but it can hibernate
> okay and doesn't take too long to return to an operation state.
> 
> When I first got the laptop I had it boxed up to return to Amazon but
> decided to find a workaround if I could.


   Remember CP/M and DOS ... fueled a huge computer revolution
   in Biz and Science - and they'd fit on a low-density floppy
   with room to spare. I sometimes despair when I hear people
   bitch about how their i9 isn't fast enough or Win or Lin
   don't have drivers for the latest bit of off-brand tech
   junk they bought direct from AliBaba.

   But people want computers to be 'magic', solve all, do all.
   This led to COMPLICATED systems and software and the need
   for hot-running expensive hardware and gigabit networks.
   Then they wonder why it all never seems to work right ...

   Is the problem insufficient hardware/software - or
   more like 'ridiculous expectations' ?

   I started with Usenet and the similar Compuserve Groups
   using DOS boxes and a 12/2400 modem. Actually used CS with
   the modem attached to a dumb terminal ... ATTD .....

   Oh, and chemical-film cameras can yield high-rez pix.
   I have a Pentax 6x7 medium format - beautiful ! It
   just ain't "instant". Take the RIGHT shot, not 99
   kinda-sorta-maybe shots.