| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<Puicnd3LWNDvi-f6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2025 05:19:46 +0000 Subject: Re: Anyone having trouble with sleep? Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <vlbl7m$gkhb$1@dont-email.me> <wwvbjwm1phq.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <ltu3ubFqm2tU6@mid.individual.net> From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> Organization: wokiesux Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:19:46 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <ltu3ubFqm2tU6@mid.individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <Puicnd3LWNDvi-f6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> Lines: 39 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97 X-Trace: sv3-zCbjF57btaa2INvWKa1OtUw4+bCNYo0OIAJEr1IMF/9VJUsfPdlx3gXxvS0PZW/P6N2UxjE1RipATa9!YFCaR2wPbLJq6SJqxCvo+Fqc0OBwGdUQju9jLIj+lqBwBXMf02bMsZnomxFPRhQUYcoAP6sAIwkf!dN4zd0FJ2N1Ahp6hwx5g X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 3048 On 1/4/25 8:00 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Sat, 04 Jan 2025 17:02:41 +0000, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > >> My partner’s computer has a similar issue. Based on some reading around >> the subject the kernel is crashing, most likely in some driver, while >> putting the computer to sleep. > > To further complicate things my Windows 11 laptop doesn't do sleep well if > a WSL instance is running. I've got the feeling it's related to turning > off the display. I may have the wrong terminology but it can hibernate > okay and doesn't take too long to return to an operation state. > > When I first got the laptop I had it boxed up to return to Amazon but > decided to find a workaround if I could. Remember CP/M and DOS ... fueled a huge computer revolution in Biz and Science - and they'd fit on a low-density floppy with room to spare. I sometimes despair when I hear people bitch about how their i9 isn't fast enough or Win or Lin don't have drivers for the latest bit of off-brand tech junk they bought direct from AliBaba. But people want computers to be 'magic', solve all, do all. This led to COMPLICATED systems and software and the need for hot-running expensive hardware and gigabit networks. Then they wonder why it all never seems to work right ... Is the problem insufficient hardware/software - or more like 'ridiculous expectations' ? I started with Usenet and the similar Compuserve Groups using DOS boxes and a 12/2400 modem. Actually used CS with the modem attached to a dumb terminal ... ATTD ..... Oh, and chemical-film cameras can yield high-rez pix. I have a Pentax 6x7 medium format - beautiful ! It just ain't "instant". Take the RIGHT shot, not 99 kinda-sorta-maybe shots.