Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<Q3udnQzBXvkGcnX7nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 02:55:23 +0000 Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (repleteness) Newsgroups: sci.math References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vbp9dk$2u3sh$1@dont-email.me> <vbq4ve$31fu6$10@dont-email.me> <fd09e9afa6b0c3041b90c5d788681bb2c92f9d2e@i2pn2.org> <vbs9v8$3l368$3@dont-email.me> <405557f7289631d63264c712d137244c940b9926@i2pn2.org> <vbsroa$3mvi7$2@dont-email.me> <vbt0fs$3pr1d$1@dont-email.me> <vbt15n$3qapk$1@dont-email.me> <btbO__HYVIMPfoOcmXp4_whV8-8@jntp> <vbums6$8kdn$1@dont-email.me> <vbv9i7$bpjh$2@dont-email.me> <13c08e96ad635f8142b38d89863a80caf17a32a8@i2pn2.org> <vc1mfe$u3ec$2@dont-email.me> <4faa63d0ff8c163f01a38736aeb5732184218a29@i2pn2.org> <vc1uu8$u3ec$9@dont-email.me> <vc2gfb$130uk$1@dont-email.me> <mrednT-A88H9JHj7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <y8idnRDAGsRvm3r7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vc77he$29vl8$1@dont-email.me> <7-ycnVjnAIKXynr7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vc7lrp$2dd4k$1@dont-email.me> <jmudndRL4M71F3r7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <a8b5743b-1bcf-49c1-936b-c4e92af9dec4@att.net> <3906cb72-4bad-4a2a-97c7-4da857adc7a4@att.net> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:55:30 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3906cb72-4bad-4a2a-97c7-4da857adc7a4@att.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <Q3udnQzBXvkGcnX7nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com> Lines: 74 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-fNJQi1Wu8cFoR7oHOmHO9jiV8DxnC5ZfaKphvW/suxSh9rPoe25reQ6NnWOGVFWUO9fhlaaNran+HMa!NWS6bl1vNBMMpuMiPlppYmWqdzADqp+IA9pPtE3xUUnWg8UFvqsNFPaKh+eDHWNcnlxLiUW9CEEu X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4747 On 09/16/2024 11:24 AM, Jim Burns wrote: > On 9/16/2024 2:13 PM, Jim Burns wrote: >> On 9/15/2024 9:31 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >>> On 09/15/2024 03:07 PM, FromTheRafters wrote: >>>> on 9/15/2024, Ross Finlayson supposed : >>>>> On 09/15/2024 11:03 AM, FromTheRafters wrote: >>>>>> After serious thinking Ross Finlayson wrote : >> >>>>>>> "What, no witty rejoinder?" >>>>>> >>>>>> What you said has no relation to >>>>>> the 'nextness' of elements in discrete sets. >>>>>> What is 'next' to Pi+2 in the reals? >>>>> >>>>> In the, "hyper-reals", it's its neighbors, >>>>> in the line-reals, put's previous and next, >>>>> in the field-reals, there's none, >>>>> and in the signal-reals, there's nothing. >> >>>> What is the successor function on the reals? >>>> Give me that, and maybe we can find the >>>> 'next' number greater than Pi. >>> >>> Ah, good sir, then I'd like you to consider >>> a representation of real numbers as >>> with an integer part and a non-integer part, >>> the integer part of the integers, and >>> the non-integer part a value in [0,1], >>> where the values in [0,1], are as of >>> this model of (a finite segment of a) continuous domain, >>> these iota-values, line-reals, >>> as so established as according to the properties of >>> extent, density, completeness, and measure, >>> fulfilling implementing the Intermediate Value Theorem, >>> thus for >>> if not being the complete-ordered-field the field-reals, >>> yet being these iota-values a continuous domain [0,1] >>> these line-reals. >> >> As n → ∞, (ι=⅟n), ⟨0,ι,2⋅ι,...,n⋅ι⟩ → ℚ∩[0,1] >> >> ℚ∩[0,1] is not complete. >> ℚ∩[0,1] has one connected component, > > Sorry. I meant the opposite of that. > ℚ∩[0,1] is NOT connected, NOT "continuous". > > For each irrational x ∈ (ℝ\ℚ)∩[0,1] > ℚ∩[0,x) and ℚ∩(x,1] are open in ℚ∩[0,1] > >> being what you (RF) call "continuous". >> ℚ∩[0,1] has no points next to each other. >> >>>>> I wonder what you think of something like Hilbert's >>>>> "postulate of continuity" for geometry, as with >>>>> regards to that in the course-of-passage of >>>>> the growth of a continuous quantity, it encounters, >>>>> in order, each of the points in the line. >> >> That sounds like the Intermediate Value Theorem, >> where "encounters each" == 'no skips". >> >> The Intermediate Value Theorem >> is equivalent to >> Dedekind completeness. >> >> > It's shewn that [0,1] has no points not in ran(f). About 2014, ....