Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<Q3udnQzBXvkGcnX7nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 02:55:23 +0000
Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit
 fractions? (repleteness)
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vbp9dk$2u3sh$1@dont-email.me>
 <vbq4ve$31fu6$10@dont-email.me>
 <fd09e9afa6b0c3041b90c5d788681bb2c92f9d2e@i2pn2.org>
 <vbs9v8$3l368$3@dont-email.me>
 <405557f7289631d63264c712d137244c940b9926@i2pn2.org>
 <vbsroa$3mvi7$2@dont-email.me> <vbt0fs$3pr1d$1@dont-email.me>
 <vbt15n$3qapk$1@dont-email.me> <btbO__HYVIMPfoOcmXp4_whV8-8@jntp>
 <vbums6$8kdn$1@dont-email.me> <vbv9i7$bpjh$2@dont-email.me>
 <13c08e96ad635f8142b38d89863a80caf17a32a8@i2pn2.org>
 <vc1mfe$u3ec$2@dont-email.me>
 <4faa63d0ff8c163f01a38736aeb5732184218a29@i2pn2.org>
 <vc1uu8$u3ec$9@dont-email.me> <vc2gfb$130uk$1@dont-email.me>
 <mrednT-A88H9JHj7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <y8idnRDAGsRvm3r7nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vc77he$29vl8$1@dont-email.me>
 <7-ycnVjnAIKXynr7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vc7lrp$2dd4k$1@dont-email.me>
 <jmudndRL4M71F3r7nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <a8b5743b-1bcf-49c1-936b-c4e92af9dec4@att.net>
 <3906cb72-4bad-4a2a-97c7-4da857adc7a4@att.net>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 19:55:30 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3906cb72-4bad-4a2a-97c7-4da857adc7a4@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <Q3udnQzBXvkGcnX7nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 74
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-fNJQi1Wu8cFoR7oHOmHO9jiV8DxnC5ZfaKphvW/suxSh9rPoe25reQ6NnWOGVFWUO9fhlaaNran+HMa!NWS6bl1vNBMMpuMiPlppYmWqdzADqp+IA9pPtE3xUUnWg8UFvqsNFPaKh+eDHWNcnlxLiUW9CEEu
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4747

On 09/16/2024 11:24 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 9/16/2024 2:13 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
>> On 9/15/2024 9:31 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>>> On 09/15/2024 03:07 PM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>> on 9/15/2024, Ross Finlayson supposed :
>>>>> On 09/15/2024 11:03 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>>>>> After serious thinking Ross Finlayson wrote :
>>
>>>>>>> "What, no witty rejoinder?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What you said has no relation to
>>>>>> the 'nextness' of elements in discrete sets.
>>>>>> What is 'next' to Pi+2 in the reals?
>>>>>
>>>>> In the, "hyper-reals", it's its neighbors,
>>>>> in the line-reals, put's previous and next,
>>>>> in the field-reals, there's none,
>>>>> and in the signal-reals, there's nothing.
>>
>>>> What is the successor function on the reals?
>>>> Give me that, and maybe we can find the
>>>> 'next' number greater than Pi.
>>>
>>> Ah, good sir, then I'd like you to consider
>>> a representation of real numbers as
>>> with an integer part and a non-integer part,
>>> the integer part of the integers, and
>>> the non-integer part a value in [0,1],
>>> where the values in [0,1], are as of
>>> this model of (a finite segment of a) continuous domain,
>>> these iota-values, line-reals,
>>> as so established as according to the properties of
>>> extent, density, completeness, and measure,
>>> fulfilling implementing the Intermediate Value Theorem,
>>> thus for
>>> if not being the complete-ordered-field the field-reals,
>>> yet being these iota-values a continuous domain [0,1]
>>> these line-reals.
>>
>> As n → ∞, (ι=⅟n), ⟨0,ι,2⋅ι,...,n⋅ι⟩ → ℚ∩[0,1]
>>
>> ℚ∩[0,1] is not complete.
>> ℚ∩[0,1] has one connected component,
>
> Sorry. I meant the opposite of that.
> ℚ∩[0,1] is NOT connected, NOT "continuous".
>
> For each irrational x ∈ (ℝ\ℚ)∩[0,1]
> ℚ∩[0,x) and ℚ∩(x,1] are open in ℚ∩[0,1]
>
>> being what you (RF) call "continuous".
>> ℚ∩[0,1] has no points next to each other.
>>
>>>>> I wonder what you think of something like Hilbert's
>>>>> "postulate of continuity" for geometry, as with
>>>>> regards to that in the course-of-passage of
>>>>> the growth of a continuous quantity, it encounters,
>>>>> in order, each of the points in the line.
>>
>> That sounds like the Intermediate Value Theorem,
>> where "encounters each" == 'no skips".
>>
>> The Intermediate Value Theorem
>> is equivalent to
>> Dedekind completeness.
>>
>>
>

It's shewn that [0,1] has no points not in ran(f).

About 2014, ....