Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<QKHiJS4WFXlVEpl_szZx_gwP9YE@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!fu-berlin.de!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <QKHiJS4WFXlVEpl_szZx_gwP9YE@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <b9f5671b8333de8a8b9f2cfceb69f808@www.novabbs.com> <_fWL1QRNDZJe9YyMRnHwHtpAbvo@jntp> <v8vs8f$2nkf1$10@dont-email.me> <17e976a312238df3$168817$546728$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com> <lhj91oFrp53U2@mid.individual.net> <v929gv$3srn5$5@dont-email.me> <QV9CDTycOcQmvSfs_5DMN5TUrWY@jntp> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: 7CSfGiNrv3xVu6RzVYFvzgcDTIY JNTP-ThreadID: XgGFOrcTXd5ZDEX07aa-LTy0U04 JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=QKHiJS4WFXlVEpl_szZx_gwP9YE@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Thu, 08 Aug 24 14:56:17 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="71962ec0b262db26e9002693f4d52627a6dd14a2"; logging-data="2024-08-08T14:56:17Z/8979840"; posting-account="190@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <python@org.invalid> Bytes: 2646 Lines: 33 Le 08/08/2024 à 16:52, Richard Hachel a écrit : > Le 08/08/2024 à 13:17, Python a écrit : >> Le 08/08/2024 à 09:05, Thomas Heger a écrit : > >>> Poincare's idea was further developed by Hermann Minkowski. >> >> This is true. > > No, it's true. "no" then "it's true"? > When Henri Poincaré (blessed be he and honored be his holy memory before the > divine Word) wrote his transformations, he gave one of the most beautiful > mathematical poems in the universe. > These transformations that Lorentz searched for years without ever finding them > are admirable. > Now, we must interpret this PHYSICALLY. > It is not by jumping like a kid like Python, shouting: "Poincaré is beautiful, > Poincaré is brilliant, Poincaré was a God in mathematics" that we will get > there. As if you had the mathematical competence to understand Poincaré! You are ridiculous. Moreover this kind of silly language "beautiful, brilliant, God in maths" is your kind, not mine. > [snip more nonsense] <http://news2.nemoweb.net/jntp?QKHiJS4WFXlVEpl_szZx_gwP9YE@jntp/Data.Media:1>