Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<QRR86zTEi17yvsKHeSb-c9XvCi8@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!usenet.goja.nl.eu.org!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <QRR86zTEi17yvsKHeSb-c9XvCi8@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: How do Universities Sell Prestigious =?UTF-8?Q?Baubles=3F?= References: <266e4dcf4bee1d0100c5716c04f2e786@www.novabbs.com> <679284FD.3ABB@ix.netcom.com> <67a111c1cd4ba39ca41fe660200ecadf@www.novabbs.com> <5e7fc5f52bd5693fabce0060ee8b91df@www.novabbs.com> <vmufi5$1r9fi$1@dont-email.me> <50d67245623f6116d399ab3a0a503fa7@www.novabbs.com> <2Kkb651yPZTAy2tSaYT3ZyhVM0s@jntp> <71934e2f2b925fe4855911df1789012a@www.novabbs.com> <q-QEiXQ4AOKi8_NRnIlJeg9iGaI@jntp> <3716e3ac9396e96c63f18572b3ea8153@www.novabbs.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics JNTP-HashClient: HpEr4Y0xSDbv7I5VPvfHc1PCpYg JNTP-ThreadID: 266e4dcf4bee1d0100c5716c04f2e786@www.novabbs.com JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=QRR86zTEi17yvsKHeSb-c9XvCi8@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Sat, 25 Jan 25 21:47:34 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="dc5d6b352757542993c5adf6fe0364b7d017a6bf"; logging-data="2025-01-25T21:47:34Z/9186666"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <jp@python.invalid> Bytes: 5273 Lines: 79 Le 25/01/2025 à 22:39, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit : > On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 21:23:51 +0000, Python wrote: > >> Le 25/01/2025 à 22:14, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit >> : >>> On Sat, 25 Jan 2025 2:33:23 +0000, Python wrote: >>> >>>> Le 24/01/2025 à 23:11, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit >>>> : >>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 22:24:04 +0000, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 1/23/2025 2:20 PM, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 21:47:25 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 18:05:49 +0000, The Starmaker wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is said that simple people are sometimes impressed by glass baubles. >>>>>>>>>> How do cheap and stupid, fallacious ideas violating basic logic attain >>>>>>>>>> prestige values and become marketed at universities for fortunes? The >>>>>>>>>> reification fallacy is an elementary fallacy and a foolish error that a >>>>>>>>>> child would know better than. However, we find universities convincing >>>>>>>>>> people that ideas involving this error are highly intelligent, such as >>>>>>>>>> expanding and bending space. Then, people uncritically and >>>>>>>>>> thoughtlessly >>>>>>>>>> embrace these ideas without a second thought. This is very pathetic, >>>>>>>>>> slavish, and avoidable. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> They become marketed at universities for fortunes by the ...'textbooks >>>>>>>>> monopoly'. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> (of course the teachers textbooks come with the answers) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You need to investigate the 'textbooks monopoly' cartel. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The cabal decides what they want you to think. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How many planets are there? Who decides the answer for you? A cabal. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The really amusing thing is that people are intellectual weaklings who >>>>>>>> couldn't reason themselves out of a paper bag, or they wouldn't accept >>>>>>>> curved space for a second. >>>>>>> Did you ever acknowledge my point that Einstein should have understood >>>>>>> that parallel lines would have to meet for space to curve? Isn't it >>>>>>> stupid as hell not to recognize that? If he had been an honest and >>>>>>> forthright person, he would have said we have to presume that parallel >>>>>>> lines meet to claim space is curved, and this is our derivation for the >>>>>>> doubling of the Newtonian deflection. Then, every reasonable person >>>>>>> would have balked at such an irrational assumption and recognized him as >>>>>>> a foolish fellow. >>>>>> >>>>>> Think of drawing two horizontal lines on a spheres surface. They will >>>>>> never intersect. >>>>> You presume space can be treated as a surface. That is a petitio >>>>> principii. You presume it's curved to conclude it's curved. It's not a >>>>> surface and its not curved. >>>> >>>> Your "petitio principii" is that a 3D space, or a 4D space-time can be >>>> "curved" the same way a surface can be. Why that? >>> What are you trying to ask or say? How can space be curved? It can't be >>> curved at all. That is the reification fallacy. >> >> Because you say so? LOL. > That is not what I said. Why is it not a reification fallacy? Because > you say so? It is, by definition, a reification fallacy because it > confuses the abstract with the physical. What are you saying is curved? > Vacuum? A field? How could you know? You are uneducated in math, and in physics.