| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<R6-cnZNFAfEWvkL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 16:34:19 +0000 Subject: Re: Steel Man of Einstein & Relativity. Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity References: <23387e561af5e3d769b94ab9ddc5f74b@www.novabbs.com> <7dfa7214e108991221d9b7115961ca87@www.novabbs.com> <AqOcnXv9t9jTwkP7nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com> <a407badbce7d5666f11edf8be6da4c9b@www.novabbs.com> <beScnQyJ8qNivUL7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <beScnQ6J8qMJvEL7nZ2dnZfqnPTYh4kr@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 09:34:20 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <beScnQ6J8qMJvEL7nZ2dnZfqnPTYh4kr@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <R6-cnZNFAfEWvkL7nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 121 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-OxpSW20spozzJvs9b3vqteZNeJS1nXzlPcRmZ5oQlxd4CXizmZ5t1EyX4VtFKAQXDaHITKTe4rjlgQ/!AeceUsGz10IJy3L+CM4Omaj2W95WkDmCUjC1ioT/Jc8/szXv47SGoHw1aTy6QvRUqSmnLqCCZulC!Ng== X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 7290 On 09/09/2024 09:25 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 09/09/2024 09:23 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: >> On 09/08/2024 11:00 PM, rhertz wrote: >>> He didn´t think nothing first. Study MORE, in particular the November >>> 1915 paper on Mercury problem. >>> >>> FIRST AT ALL: It wasn't Einstein who thought about spacetime bending and >>> twisting due to heavy gravitational masses. It was Marcel Grossman, in >>> 1913, while developing Entwurf I. Einstein didn't know shit about that >>> new mathematics, based on absolute differential geometry. The adoption >>> of such concept came MANY YEARS AFTER 1915, by the hand of many other >>> MATHEMATICIANS AND ROGUE PHYSICISTS. >>> >>> Points to be made CRISTAL CLEAR: >>> >>> 1) The solution of Mercury's problem didn't involve ANY CONCEPT OF >>> SPACETIME. Not even the handling of Hilbert's Field Equations, which >>> Einstein appropriated in 1915. Such solution ELIMINATED the time >>> variable, as it was FIXED using gravitational potential as the 4th. >>> coordinate. TIME (as flowing while Mercury was orbiting was dismissed. >>> Instead, calculations were made over an ENTIRE REVOLUTION around the >>> Sun). Only at the end, the PERIOD was introduced by using the 2nd. >>> Kepler's Law. >>> >>> 3) The problem was managed by his proposal of a NEWTONIAN law of kinetic >>> + potential energy, like it was used to calculate Newtonian orbits: >>> K+U=E. Once he got the analytical expression of a Newtonian orbit, he >>> HACKED the equation by introducing a OBSCURE MODIFICATION of the >>> Newtonian potential (Eq. 7c). He replaced, without any substantiation U= >>> -GM/r (Newton) by U= -GM (1+L^2/r^2). This FRAUDULENT CHANGE allowed to >>> transform a quadratic polynomial (pure Newton) into a cubic polynomial, >>> in the expression of (dx/d@)^2. This trick, by solving the integral of >>> d@ from perihelion to aphelion, provided a small difference over PHI, >>> and that was all. >>> >>> 4) IN NO CASE the space bending was used, as the calculations were based >>> on a flat spatial orbit around the Sun, following a CLASSICAL Newtonian >>> approach. >>> >>> 5) All the crap about matter bending space and energy dictating how came >>> MANY YEARS AFTER 1915, by CORRUPT SOLD OUT SCHOLARS, who made a healthy >>> living by profiting about the infinite MATHEMATICAL SOLUTIONS (not >>> PHYSICALS) that the complexity of GR allowed. Of the hundred of >>> solutions found in the decades to come, almost ALL OF THEM were >>> dismissed, because it had no any possible physical meaning in order to >>> support GR. >>> >>> BECAUSE MATHEMATICS IS NOT PHYSICS, AND GR MATHEMATICS IS A HUGE SCAM >>> POPULARIZED BY PEOPLE WITHOUT MORAL AND ETHICS. THEY JUST FOUND AN EASY >>> WAY TO MAKE A LIVING PLAYING WITH GR, CREATING FANTASY WORLDS THAT WORTH >>> NOTHING. >>> >>> READ MORE AND STUDY MORE, FYLANSSON. >> >> Yeah, I'll try. >> >> The other day I'm reading in the World Fact Book of 1846 that Faraday >> discovered a "Magnetization of Light" according to which polarization >> in effect is a pretty simple table-top experiment, as in according to >> something like "Faraday rotations". >> >> Then the old "ether" theory is sort of wrapped as new these days as >> yon "aether" theory, as with regards to the Equivalence Principle >> (of acceleration motively and acceleration gravitationally) as with >> regards to that it's really rather terrestrial. >> >> So, we lionize Einstein and not just because of the conceptual >> "Fourth Dimension" separating the strength of science from the >> strength of theory so that there's hope, and besides the fact >> that something like e = mc^2 is just the first term of the Taylor >> series of K.E. kinetic energy, and in the surrounds of Kelvin and >> Rayleigh and Young and Millikan with regards to Fresnel and Huygens >> and later Broglie and Bohm, about the "success" of relativity and >> the "success" of quantum mechanics, where the quotes only mean >> "not unqualified", and particularly as with regards to Einstein's >> later and wiser "Out of My Later Years" where he defines that in >> Relativity that "SR is local" and "GR is first", while working on >> what's required of the mathematical theory to provide the >> super-classical extra-standard, of which he wasn't un-aware, >> and even the basic notions for classical mechanics, of the >> zero'eth laws as with regards to on the one side "absement" >> as before displacement, and on the other, the infinitely-many >> higher orders of acceleration in any change of motion, mathematically. >> >> >> Then you're at your leisure to bring him down, yet only what >> matters is to bring something better, up. >> >> >> The other day some article was like "GR and QM unified", and >> it's like, I see you've log-normaled your g-2 and slanted your bias. >> >> I try learning, https://www.youtube.com/@rossfinlayson . >> >> >> > > There's also the cosmological constant, vanishing yet non-zero, > where today's sky survey thoroughly establishes "space-time is flat", > so it's vanishing, while, there's gravity and all, so non-zero. > > Extra-classical, super-standard, .... > > It's broke? Fix it. > > It's like, when Zeeman accepts a Nobel Prize in 1903 and talks https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/1902/zeeman/lecture/ about a different configuration of experiment with regards to the sodium lines, we know today that there are at least three sodium lines, as after of course the great success of spectroscopy after blackbody radiation, electron physics, the ultraviolet catastrophe, that many avenues yet deserve exploration of course for anything what remains today as being called an, "effect". Like, Fraunhofer diffraction is profound. (If spelled variously.)