Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <RPvLJWuw8z32lAq2KSr5n_u6nII@jntp>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<RPvLJWuw8z32lAq2KSr5n_u6nII@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <RPvLJWuw8z32lAq2KSr5n_u6nII@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: [SR] =?UTF-8?Q?Why=3F=20?=
References: <LD4K6BjN8LU7EyULcWktoQOIq38@jntp> <a9ce6a08d87164cd99e9d1b296a2fcfe@www.novabbs.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: Mr-7PNZa4KzlvqQNtilzVQ7Yo74
JNTP-ThreadID: 61Fhfl3qIKFqhWvc18UjRuJvuko
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=RPvLJWuw8z32lAq2KSr5n_u6nII@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 24 19:03:17 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-06-19T19:03:17Z/8909527"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 2254
Lines: 37

Le 19/06/2024 à 20:55, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit :
> Richard Hachel wrote:
>>
>> One of the fundamental equations of the theory of relativity, 
>> To²=Tr²+Et², probably even one of the most beautiful in all of science,
>> 
>> will however pose a small problem for a few months to the greatest 
>> theorist of our time: the doctor Richard Hachel.
> 
> Hachel failed to define his terms, so that's neither fundamental nor
> beautiful.
> 
>> A problem will appear to emerge in the development of uniformly 
>> accelerated frames of reference, because if we set x=(1/2.a.Tr²+Vr.Tr)
>> it no longer works.
> 
> If the first equation is relativistic, the second surely is not.

It is.

Je n'ai pas écrit:
x=(1/2)a.To²+Vo.To

but:
 x=(1/2).a.Tr²+Vr.Tr

Cette dernière équation est relativiste.

Mais j'ai précisé qu'elle était relativiste, mais fausse.

Et j'ai demandé si on comprenait pourquoi?

R.H.