| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<Rpu0RKeGMLYXY8hQTomQ_wWNFvY@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <Rpu0RKeGMLYXY8hQTomQ_wWNFvY@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Replacement of Cardinality References: <hsRF8g6ZiIZRPFaWbZaL2jR1IiU@jntp> <bdfbb725-7fc3-4e17-b09b-4d6191d301a5@att.net> <tvUGDEKZBjBIOn4R0HIJvG5es4k@jntp> <val92g$33pkn$1@dont-email.me> <val9hk$33mgs$1@dont-email.me> <GknMvtkLnWBwOVHuwhpOvuPVwIg@jntp> <5d289c3ad609a69bad184ed6c95fbedc401f0189@i2pn2.org> <van69b$3fpfi$1@dont-email.me> <dyeY8rd2o9vs021HNxZ7wfjDkq4@jntp> <vanb5a$3ghf5$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: brExCGgYSGocwSj6ZWmJsrsX_ec JNTP-ThreadID: KFm3f7lT2HjaTSiMfnv5xqZoSBw JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=Rpu0RKeGMLYXY8hQTomQ_wWNFvY@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Thu, 29 Aug 24 13:35:55 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="82b75c1d0a83e677ff646b52485f72f8b23749df"; logging-data="2024-08-29T13:35:55Z/9004783"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 2217 Lines: 18 Le 28/08/2024 à 16:10, FromTheRafters a écrit : > on 8/28/2024, WM supposed : >> Le 28/08/2024 à 14:47, Moebius a écrit : >>> Am 28.08.2024 um 06:20 schrieb joes: >> >>>> „Sufficient” meaning „not infinitesimal”. >>> >>> Right. After all, each and every _real_ number x > 0 is "sufficiently >>> large". >> >> Wrong. "Sufficient" means that ℵo non-empty finite gaps between unit >> fractions fit into the interval. One gap already is larger some x > 0. Why do >> you think that ℵo non-empty finite gaps are smaller than every x > 0? > > Because of the way the reals are constructed. Not a reason - and wrong. Regards, WM