Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<Rvr8qUtKBBvsbApYKUMza3mZzCI@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <Rvr8qUtKBBvsbApYKUMza3mZzCI@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method
References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp> <lscd99FrdlmU1@mid.individual.net>
 <nbIKxzcTXKviqKHe3MOYkBQMjII@jntp> <1WtCff6_rqltbeqcBsoo9BvDMqg@jntp> <6U3NAOIgT2D2_6uy86xLkb7mEgk@jntp>
 <pSBDN09gUYiBuRXuhy7L_GCs1Bk@jntp> <YKWwOGme4kISW0uD1yjYsJzsyRs@jntp> <lkSMn-X3lP4druvKe833qXB30Yo@jntp>
 <H95fWb48eQ3TZ3xuuWPjR0vauWM@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: i85ey7nZq2zDVdgz7pews2OONC0
JNTP-ThreadID: YYnLTqUhhEGH779uk7wevDN2vH4
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=Rvr8qUtKBBvsbApYKUMza3mZzCI@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 24 18:15:57 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="a2db72c04f585d06cf196654fdd975ff3059d93b"; logging-data="2024-12-17T18:15:57Z/9145158"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com>
Bytes: 2240
Lines: 24

Le 17/12/2024 à 19:14, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
> Le 17/12/2024 à 18:57, Python a écrit :
>>> This is necessarily true
>> 
>> So why don't you stop suggesting otherwise by claiming that it is not said for 
>> who "A marks tA/t'A" or "B marks tB"?
>> 
>> Are you playing being an idiot or are really an idiot? (I know the answer).
> 
> But that's not true, damn it...
> 
> He still hasn't understood.
> 
> I'M TALKING ABOUT THE OTHER watch.
> 
> [snip irrelevant rant]

Richard the discussion here is about Einstein's procedure, not your bunch 
of nonsense.

You made a claim about this procedure that is a plain lie.

End Of Story.