| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<Rvr8qUtKBBvsbApYKUMza3mZzCI@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <Rvr8qUtKBBvsbApYKUMza3mZzCI@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Relativistic synchronisation method References: <4-GlI_h7vkz4Ndsd_KixgDLS7Gg@jntp> <kQ0LSPYPi-eXWvUX1l430FGQz6g@jntp> <lscd99FrdlmU1@mid.individual.net> <nbIKxzcTXKviqKHe3MOYkBQMjII@jntp> <1WtCff6_rqltbeqcBsoo9BvDMqg@jntp> <6U3NAOIgT2D2_6uy86xLkb7mEgk@jntp> <pSBDN09gUYiBuRXuhy7L_GCs1Bk@jntp> <YKWwOGme4kISW0uD1yjYsJzsyRs@jntp> <lkSMn-X3lP4druvKe833qXB30Yo@jntp> <H95fWb48eQ3TZ3xuuWPjR0vauWM@jntp> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: i85ey7nZq2zDVdgz7pews2OONC0 JNTP-ThreadID: YYnLTqUhhEGH779uk7wevDN2vH4 JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net JNTP-Uri: http://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=Rvr8qUtKBBvsbApYKUMza3mZzCI@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Tue, 17 Dec 24 18:15:57 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="a2db72c04f585d06cf196654fdd975ff3059d93b"; logging-data="2024-12-17T18:15:57Z/9145158"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <jpierre.messager@gmail.com> Bytes: 2240 Lines: 24 Le 17/12/2024 à 19:14, Richard Hachel a écrit : > Le 17/12/2024 à 18:57, Python a écrit : >>> This is necessarily true >> >> So why don't you stop suggesting otherwise by claiming that it is not said for >> who "A marks tA/t'A" or "B marks tB"? >> >> Are you playing being an idiot or are really an idiot? (I know the answer). > > But that's not true, damn it... > > He still hasn't understood. > > I'M TALKING ABOUT THE OTHER watch. > > [snip irrelevant rant] Richard the discussion here is about Einstein's procedure, not your bunch of nonsense. You made a claim about this procedure that is a plain lie. End Of Story.