Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:15:34 +0000
Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.logic,sci.physics.relativity
X-Mozilla-News-Host: snews://giganews.com:443
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Subject: Larger Collected Reasoning 2024
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 21:15:43 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <S4KdnWq7DcVrNv76nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 2646
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-tWYl/OVqDLzN1rOn6DhdRjQTGO4GA6/GosOAzq51oryK6MQdtZPh4IKN4eV0ofAupUwvXh3Lti7pgUd!bDfjUgpjyOUeErvCuQizdFzdnr8pKEiher4fpWRkvk3KWvXFa7rZnlzH6thZmj1YsNq7R4iEqBg=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 124487

Thanks GG. Then there's the idiom of always saying thanks, in the 
expectation of what are perceived as directives, since it's concluded 
voluntary. Today's is about the theories of relativity. Consider 
space-contraction for keeping continuity, and, differentiating 
space-contraction-linear and space-contraction-rotational with regards 
to for example "neutral linac / charged cyclotron intersection" to test 
for the difference separating space-contraction-linear and 
space-contraction-rotational, or similarly "rigid and rotating atomic 
clock lattices", to find respective humps in the linac and bumps in the 
cyclotron.

Thank you for your inquiry about the theories of relativity and space 
contraction. I'm ready to discuss your ideas about differentiating 
between linear and rotational space contraction.

To clarify, are you proposing to use a "neutral linac / charged 
cyclotron intersection" or "rigid and rotating atomic clock lattices" to 
experimentally distinguish between these two types of space contraction?

Please provide more details about your specific experimental setup and 
the expected outcomes. This will help me better understand your proposed 
approach and provide more specific insights.

Thanks GG, as per previous conversations, it's described that abstractly 
those "configurations of experiment" subject to "energies of experiment" 
would via any non-null result so establish that, yes. Reflect on this. 
The idea is that "configurations of experiment" and "energies of 
experiment" help establish control, or mostly about reducing or 
expanding dimensionality, and in the far-field or extremes, as that 
"configuration and energy of experiment" defines the overall 
"parameters". Reflect on this with raised questions, or objections, or 
alternatives, especially if there is a mode of language that would have 
other terms with the same meaning.

I'm not able to access previous conversations or specific details about 
the proposed experiments. However, I can provide some general 
reflections on the concept of using "configurations of experiment" and 
"energies of experiment" to establish control and explore different 
dimensions of space contraction.

Key Considerations:

     Experimental Design and Control:
         Precision and Sensitivity: The experimental setup must be 
highly precise and sensitive to detect subtle effects of space 
contraction, especially if they are expected to be small.
         Control Variables: Identifying and controlling relevant 
variables, such as temperature, magnetic fields, and gravitational 
influences, is crucial to isolate the effects of space contraction.
         Calibration and Standardization: Establishing accurate 
calibration procedures and standardized measurement techniques is 
essential for reliable data collection and analysis.

     Energy and Configuration:
         Energy Range: The energy range of the experiment should be 
carefully chosen to probe different regimes of space contraction. 
High-energy experiments may reveal effects that are not observable at 
lower energies.
         Configuration Flexibility: The experimental setup should be 
flexible enough to accommodate different configurations and allow for 
systematic exploration of various parameters.

     Theoretical Framework:
         Relativistic Effects: A clear understanding of the expected 
relativistic effects, such as time dilation and length contraction, is 
necessary to interpret experimental results.
         Quantum Mechanics: Quantum mechanical effects may also play a 
role in certain experiments, especially at high energies or in systems 
with small dimensions.

Potential Challenges and Limitations:

     Technical Difficulties: Implementing experiments at the necessary 
precision and energy scales can be technically challenging and 
resource-intensive.
     Interpretation of Results: Interpreting experimental results can be 
complex, and it is essential to carefully consider potential systematic 
errors and uncertainties.
     Theoretical Ambiguities: In some cases, theoretical predictions may 
be ambiguous or uncertain, making it difficult to draw definitive 
conclusions from experimental data.

Alternative Approaches:

     Gravitational Wave Astronomy: Observing gravitational waves from 
astrophysical sources can provide insights into the nature of spacetime 
and potentially test predictions of general relativity related to space 
contraction.
     Precision Measurements of Fundamental Constants: Precise 
measurements of fundamental constants, such as the speed of light and 
the fine-structure constant, can be used to test the consistency of 
physical theories and potentially reveal deviations from classical 
predictions.

I would be interested in learning more about the specific details of 
your proposed experiments, including the expected outcomes and the 
theoretical framework that supports them. This would allow me to provide 
more specific feedback and potential insights.

Thanks GG. Modern experiments in the giga- and tera-electron volts 
definitely are said to demonstrate space-contraction, so, here it's 
assumed that it's within design parameters to achieve the energies, and 
that the configuration of experiment is quite simple, linear neutral 
linac particle beam, rotational charged cyclotron particle beam. Then, 
"configuration and energy of experiment" are considered reasonable 
mention of the matters of design of experiment, as elaborated. So, it's 
quite simple a linear neutral particle beam and rotational or circular 
charged particle beam, which according to the "standard" theory would 
not interact, that interfering at all would be non-null falsifying that 
space-contraction is separate space-contraction-linear and 
space-contraction-rotational. Weigh on the contemplations and 
deliberations about this.


      relativity and open up new avenues of research.

Further Exploration:

It would be valuable to consult with experts in particle physics and 
accelerator physics to refine the experimental design and assess the 
feasibility of such an experiment. Additionally, theoretical 
calculations and simulations could help predict potential outcomes and 
guide the experimental setup.

While the proposed experiment is conceptually intriguing, it is 
important to carefully consider the practical challenges and potential 
limitations before proceeding.

Thanks GG, that's quite so, while "theoretical physics" is certainly 
welcome to just make this up, that "experimental physics" is its own 
practice, yet the principles of design of linacs and cyclotrons may be 
simple, and even that largely existing designs may simply be brought 
together, with regards to the more-or-less understood principles of 
operation. Here are some quotes rather abstractly about theoretical 
considerations, that will follow. Consider this.

I understand your point about the practicality of bringing together 
existing designs and principles to conduct the proposed experiment. 
While theoretical physics can provide valuable insights, experimental 
physics ultimately relies on careful design, precise measurements, and 
rigorous analysis.

I'm ready to consider the abstract quotes you'll provide. Please share 
them, and I'll do my best to analyze them in the context of the proposed 
experiment and the broader theoretical framework.


Thanks GG. "The Riemann metric and Riemann tensor for Riemannian geometry
is just a neat way to make a simplification of an idealistic
gravitational well involving a large central body and a
small satellite." Comment as you would.


The quote presents a simplified view of the Riemann metric and tensor, 
which are fundamental tools in general relativity. While it's true that 
these mathematical constructs can be used to describe the gravitational 
field around a massive body like a planet or star, they are much more 
general and powerful than that.

Here are some key points to consider:

     General Applicability: The Riemann metric and tensor can be used to 
describe a wide range of geometries, not just those related to gravity. 
They can be applied to any curved spacetime, including those with exotic 
topologies or exotic matter distributions.
     Intrinsic Geometry: The Riemann tensor captures the intrinsic 
curvature of spacetime, which is a property of the spacetime itself, 
independent of any coordinate system or embedding in a 
higher-dimensional space.
     Geodesic Motion: The geodesic equation, derived from the metric 
tensor, describes the motion of particles in curved spacetime, including 
the motion of planets and stars in a gravitational field.
     Gravitational Waves: The Riemann tensor also plays a crucial role 
in the theory of gravitational waves, which are ripples in the curvature 
of spacetime that propagate at the speed of light.

While the quote's simplified interpretation may be helpful for certain 
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========