Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <T4OTWhChrlCvMGgFqbZDcXBAN0I@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net>
 <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <v6mlhe$21277$2@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: 8s6TK7uVoPJAb2mkVIZTxzIuIeg
JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=T4OTWhChrlCvMGgFqbZDcXBAN0I@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 24 20:41:31 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-10T20:41:31Z/8942398"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr>
Bytes: 4589
Lines: 55

Le 10/07/2024 à 20:56, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
> Den 09.07.2024 15:47, skrev Richard Hachel:

>> The paradox is this: The greatest relativistic physicist in the universe 
>> (Richard Hachel) said that the effects of physics are reciprocal by 
>> permutation of observer, and therefore, if we take the INTERNAL 
>> mechanism of two watches, each will beat faster than the other, both on 
>> the outward and return journey, or during a long circular journey.
>> 
> 
> A very naive notion. 😂

This is not a naive notion but a notion that is difficult to understand 
when you don't have the key, and which has posed problems for many 
physicists for 120 years.
At the time of the beginnings of relativity, a hundred physicists stood up 
against Einstein, and an article was written "A hundred physicists against 
Einstein" proof that everything was not completely clear. So no, you are 
wrong Paul B.Andersen in saying that it is simple and that I am naive.
Einstein also replied "Why a hundred authors? If I was wrong, just one 
would have been enough."
We can still say the same thing today, and if you make a petition, you 
will find 100 authors to countersign the fact that I am wrong. But we 
still won't know more about the truth of things.
No, things are not simple. It is not easy to explain that "the effects of 
physics are symmetrical and reciprocal by permutation of observer".
This seems obvious, but as soon as the good doctor Hachel asks to apply 
the principle, no one can follow.
This therefore means that the expansion of the chronotropies is reciprocal 
by change of observer and simply as a function of relative speed. That is 
to say that moment after moment, the internal mechanism of Stella's watch 
will appear to beat more slowly for Terrence. On the way out, during the 
U-turn, and during the return. Always, always, always, Terrence will note 
that Stella's watch only goes 0.6 seconds while his watches beats 1 
second. What is a paradoxical moment, if we do not understand this perfect 
reciprocity, is that for its part, second after second, on the way out, 
during the U-turn, and on the way back, Terrence's watch goes constantly 
beating slower for Stella. The reciprocity of the dilation of chronotropy 
is perfect.
So why is Stella 18 and Terrence 30?
This is true, but yet it seems absurd.
I explained it: because we confuse internal chronotropy (Lorentz factor, 
gamma factor) and measurement of time marked on watches.
It is not the same thing, and this is the first explanation of the 
paradox.
But there is a second, the spatial zoom effect, which is only a simple 
effect of elasticity of lengths and reciprocal distances.
Remember the term: reciprocal. Thus Stella's rocket seems three times 
longer on the return trip, but Terrence's telescope will also appear three 
times longer. The distance itself between his rocket and the earth will be 
three times longer: the highlight of the show and the point of reasoning 
in which intervenors like Python literally drown without understanding 
anything about the beauty and evidence of the theory.
So no, it's neither simple nor naive.

R.H.