Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<T5KdnU34aYaZKuz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 20:54:28 +0000
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary, effectively)
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me>
 <4bf8a77e-4b2a-471f-9075-0b063098153f@att.net> <vjv6uv$2dra0$1@dont-email.me>
 <31180d7e-1c2b-4e2b-b8d6-e3e62f05da43@att.net> <vk1brk$2srss$7@dont-email.me>
 <bb80c6c5-04c0-4e2d-bb21-ac51aab9e252@att.net> <vk23m7$31l8v$1@dont-email.me>
 <bce1b27d-170c-4385-8938-36805c983c49@att.net> <vk693m$f52$2@dont-email.me>
 <a17eb8b6-7d11-4c59-b98c-b4d5de8358ca@att.net> <vk7dmb$7mh2$2@dont-email.me>
 <b72490c1-e61a-4c23-a3a5-f624b2c084e4@att.net> <vk8tbq$j9h1$1@dont-email.me>
 <bd7dfdc7-6471-4fe6-b078-0ca739031580@att.net> <vklumc$3htmt$1@dont-email.me>
 <c03cf79d-0572-4b19-ad92-a0d12df53db9@att.net>
 <n9CdnR02SsevtPL6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <45a632ed-26cc-4730-a8dd-1e504d6df549@att.net> <vkpa98$dofu$2@dont-email.me>
 <15f183ae29abb8c09c0915ee3c8355634636da31@i2pn2.org>
 <UY-cndwXAt7-4O36nZ2dnZfqnPYAAAAA@giganews.com>
 <cc538b04-66c2-453e-8abf-e1a425cc2b77@att.net>
 <loKcnQ1ho8WXVe36nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <b9bd0527-41c1-4006-80cd-cdcf56f27870@att.net>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2024 12:54:32 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <b9bd0527-41c1-4006-80cd-cdcf56f27870@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <T5KdnU34aYaZKuz6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 67
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-iAfzed6+UCYxA49UEVeyVrqYuvNnWAA8U5fa9TXB7DpceCjwtBBYKuUqG84o2MQUSLsuksllM3inSKl!p4OVlSx7ErZdZ0OsaLRT169+KWIxsY7K+J5JUt7uuv+ZbF35x/V0kjOAXgvBoC7IkwG0tRdZ9qg=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 4041

On 12/29/2024 12:34 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
> On 12/28/2024 10:54 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>> On 12/28/2024 04:22 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
>>> On 12/28/2024 5:36 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
>
>>>> Then it's like
>>>> "no, it's distribution is non-standard,
>>>> not-a-real-function,
>>>> with real-analytical-character".
>>>
>>> Which is to say,
>>> "no, it isn't what it's described to be"
>>
>> You already accept
>
> No.
> You (RF) are greatly mistaken about
> my (JB's) position with regard to
> infinitely.many equal real.number steps
> from 0 to 1
>
> My position is and has been that they don't exist.
>
>> You already accept that the "natural/unit
>> equivalency function" has range with
>> _constant monotone strictly increasing_
>> has _constant_ differences, _constant_,
>> that as a cumulative function, for a
>> distribution, has that relating to
>> the naturals, as uniform.
>
> My position, expressed in different ways,
> is and has been that,
> for each positive real x,
> a finite integer n exists such that
> n⋅x > 1
>
> That conflicts with the existence of
> infinitely.many equal real.number steps
> from 0 to 1
>
>

Oh, you had that [0/d, 1/d, 2/d, ... oo/d]
was a thing, it's equi-partitioning at all,
you said "that's at most rationals",
so, now you have changed your mind
that "extent" and "density" were so?

The equi-partitioning is a very usual thing,
about things like Jordan measure for the
line-integral the line-elements of the
line-integral and the path-integral,
the equi-partitioning.

Anyways, yeah you already said "extent"
and "density" were so, about why the
natural/unit equivalency function is
a probabilistic distribution of the
natural integers at uniform random.



So, yeah, it conflicts with yourself,
yet, that's what you said.