Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<TDhmx1X7PRvYedfvKb65uxVqE2I@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <TDhmx1X7PRvYedfvKb65uxVqE2I@jntp> JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: New Terrell Rotation Animation References: <c68e278492a909b6befcd6442c1c63a5@www.novabbs.com> <voaq4e$o6dm$1@dont-email.me> <7920867a73fc70ede7b8cef4add1adab@www.novabbs.com> <vobah6$rh7l$1@dont-email.me> <wpQkk1b1pUdI-3KhmUaW48tRd9k@jntp> <02a0556b4b0f958f99e193c59e0e74fa@www.novabbs.com> <RpZ61q0Wfr5lQkTDaOWHYentQPY@jntp> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: zODOaVh_LJnEcUkRtKxQtgjHvdI JNTP-ThreadID: c68e278492a909b6befcd6442c1c63a5@www.novabbs.com JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=TDhmx1X7PRvYedfvKb65uxVqE2I@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/1.0 JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net Date: Mon, 10 Feb 25 00:56:23 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0a7a22851986081dc9c7fdad87dc82ce6735ff85"; logging-data="2025-02-10T00:56:23Z/9203737"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Python <jp@python.invalid> Bytes: 2233 Lines: 24 Le 10/02/2025 à 01:15, Richard Hachel a écrit : > Le 10/02/2025 à 01:03, tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) a écrit : >> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 23:22:07 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote: > >> All these years posting about special relativity, and you don't >> understand the Lampa–Terrell–Penrose effect? >> >> For shame! > > We must apply the Lorentz transformations. > Poincaré gave them correctly. Also did Einstein with a more profound derivation. > The geometric considerations of Lampa-Terrell-Penrose are ridiculous and > incorrect. > This is not at all the way to go about it, and these views are completely false. Because you say so ? Well also (-1)^2 = -1 because you said so :-) ?