Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<TDhmx1X7PRvYedfvKb65uxVqE2I@jntp>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fdn.fr!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <TDhmx1X7PRvYedfvKb65uxVqE2I@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: New Terrell Rotation Animation
References: <c68e278492a909b6befcd6442c1c63a5@www.novabbs.com> <voaq4e$o6dm$1@dont-email.me>
 <7920867a73fc70ede7b8cef4add1adab@www.novabbs.com> <vobah6$rh7l$1@dont-email.me> <wpQkk1b1pUdI-3KhmUaW48tRd9k@jntp>
 <02a0556b4b0f958f99e193c59e0e74fa@www.novabbs.com> <RpZ61q0Wfr5lQkTDaOWHYentQPY@jntp>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: zODOaVh_LJnEcUkRtKxQtgjHvdI
JNTP-ThreadID: c68e278492a909b6befcd6442c1c63a5@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-ReferenceUserID: 4@nemoweb.net
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=TDhmx1X7PRvYedfvKb65uxVqE2I@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 25 00:56:23 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="0a7a22851986081dc9c7fdad87dc82ce6735ff85"; logging-data="2025-02-10T00:56:23Z/9203737"; posting-account="190@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Python <jp@python.invalid>
Bytes: 2233
Lines: 24

Le 10/02/2025 à 01:15, Richard Hachel a écrit :
> Le 10/02/2025 à 01:03, tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog) a écrit :
>> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 23:22:07 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:
> 
>> All these years posting about special relativity, and you don't
>> understand the Lampa–Terrell–Penrose effect?
>> 
>> For shame!
> 
> We must apply the Lorentz transformations.
> Poincaré gave them correctly.

Also did Einstein with a more profound derivation.

> The geometric considerations of Lampa-Terrell-Penrose are ridiculous and 
> incorrect.
> This is not at all the way to go about it, and these views are completely false.

Because you say so ?

Well also (-1)^2 = -1 because you said so :-) ?