Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<TsudnYL_HJhO12n6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 21:59:47 +0000
Subject: Re: Rewriting SSA. Is This A Chance For GNU/Linux?
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
References: <pan$54963$b3f3d4e6$ae35ff46$71fe05c9@linux.rocks>
 <gXCdnTD2YLRBaHX6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <m4tf1dFmvh3U1@mid.individual.net> <vsd0ui$365s0$1@dont-email.me>
 <vsds7u$2u8h$1@dont-email.me> <wwviknpb1iw.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
 <vsksb5$3df6l$1@dont-email.me>
 <ZI2dnQjwJajG9XP6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <m581c7Fd22eU2@mid.individual.net>
 <DJOdnXslWrdAbHP6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <m58mnpFguqjU2@mid.individual.net> <vso5qc$31clb$1@dont-email.me>
 <E2WdnXiNaZ9CTXL6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <pan$f2307$df5236a$923c4908$a6fb4a1f@linux.rocks>
 <6BidndvG26Vec236nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vsr383$2421k$1@dont-email.me>
 <Tz2dnbEsYvaaHmz6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vss108$2vde2$6@dont-email.me>
 <MI-dnf3_6bzzM2z6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com> <vt1d6c$e0sl$2@dont-email.me>
From: c186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2025 17:59:45 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vt1d6c$e0sl$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <TsudnYL_HJhO12n6nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 82
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-bTFz6cquTwTQqwV9hF9jBQHYYchXuITcrC1mGW47xMXM0T1OC05nd6lHStEgdBZta36gPVi+ZFRR/eR!MODyBQMUSO1QoSYIzEHyXeAB5zMhBCGiy+y2aOHaJhYF7UGplc6NtkuhVomA9I+L3luxNb6GuX5E
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 5406

On 4/7/25 4:39 PM, -hh wrote:
> On 4/5/25 18:27, c186282 wrote:
>> On 4/5/25 3:40 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
>>> On 05/04/2025 20:22, c186282 wrote:
>>>> Analog ... 
>>>
>>> Massive arrays of non linear analogue circuits for modelling things 
>>> like the Navier Stokes equations would be possible: Probably make a 
>>> better stab at climate modelling then the existing shit.
>>
>>    Again with analog, it's the sensitivity to especially
>>    temperature conditions that add errors in. Keep
>>    carrying those errors through several stages and soon
>>    all you have is error, pretending to be The Solution.
>>    Again, perhaps some meta-material that's NOT sensitive
>>    to what typically throws-off analog electronics MIGHT
>>    be made.
>>
>>    I'm trying to visualize what it would take to make
>>    an all-analog version of, say, a payroll spreadsheet :-)
> 
> Woogh!  That makes my brain hurt.


   Indeed ! However ... probably COULD be done, it's
   a bunch of shifting values - input to some accts,
   calx ops, shift to other accts ....... lots and
   lots of rheostats ........

   I'm not gonna try it !  :-)


>>    Now discrete use of analog as, as you suggested, doing
>>    multiplication/division/logs initiated and read by
>>    digital ... ?
>>
>>    Oh well, we're out in sci-fi land with most of this ...
>>    may as well talk about using giant evil brains in
>>    jars as computers  :-)
>>
>>    As some here have mentioned, we may be closer to the
>>    limits of computer power that we'd like to think.
>>    Today's big trick is parallelization, but only some
>>    kinds of problems can be modeled that way.
>>
>>    Saw an article the other day about using some kind
>>    of disulfide for de-facto transistors, but did not
>>    get the impression that they'd be fast. I think
>>    temperature resistance was the main thrust - industrial
>>    apps, Venus landers and such.
> 
> Actually, one of the things that Analog's still good at is real world 
> control systems with feeback loops and all the like.

   As long as it's pretty straightforward, analog can
   sometimes do it quicker and simpler. I oft wonder
   whether the problem of a self-balancing android
   might be handled better with analog feedback schemes.

   Of course nerves are, ultimately, 'digital' - pulses
   of varying rate/spacing but always the same strength.
   Some of the sensory stuff even gets 'compressed'/encoded
   before going to the brain. Every little leg hair does
   not its own direct nerve to the brain.

> I had one project some time 'way back in the 80s where we were 
> troubleshooting a line that had a 1960s era analog control system, and 
> one of the conversations that came up was if to replace it with digital. 
> It got looked into and was determined that digital process controls 
> weren't fast enough for the line.
> 
> Fast-forward to ~2005.  While back visiting that department, I found out 
> that that old analog beast was still running the line and they were 
> trolling eBay for parts to keep it running.

   Hey, so long as it works well !

> On another visit ~2015, the update:  they finally found a new digitally 
> based control system that was fast enough to finally replace it & did.

   What was the thing doing ?