Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<U26dnbaeh9nE1Fj6nZ2dnZfqnPjvyJ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 06:16:57 +0000
Subject: Re: comments, The joy of FORTRAN
Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc
References: <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad>
 <1193769225.762545617.347047.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org>
 <j6KwP.62410$OrR5.58268@fx18.iad>
 <tcmcnTfrnOhGnFn6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vq2fu3$6db$3@gal.iecc.com>
 <yI-cndUOFbNCsFj6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com>
 <m2kt7qFsoc0U3@mid.individual.net>
From: c186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 01:16:54 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <m2kt7qFsoc0U3@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <U26dnbaeh9nE1Fj6nZ2dnZfqnPjvyJ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 23
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-TUsKotvAy/Y/tZvcirARCZwYTf8Ruzg2jkK/umLUnTT+88uY3D0fdqz3HEXme0IM2ALzmAtEfoEe5gt!fignEDyw9Q7grQsGVX7soPvVpzQWlip9DhYeyuYgNvhOqbneR8cdiHJQ9fWpqUTkX+METlRlnj/U
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2058

On 3/3/25 12:32 AM, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 23:19:41 -0500, c186282 wrote:
> 
>> On 3/2/25 3:43 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>> According to c186282  <c186282@nnada.net>:
>>>>     Even 'clear' C is often NOT so clear - neither the syntax or logic.
>>>>     You've gotta EXPLAIN every step to yourself.
>>>
>>> Well, yeah.
>>>
>>> 	i += 2;	/* add 1 to index */
>>
>> Actually, that adds 2 to the index
> 
> And here I thought it was an example of a comment that never was
> updated...


   COULD be  :-)

   Or the code could be bad.

   Diligence is mandatory.