| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<U26dnbaeh9nE1Fj6nZ2dnZfqnPjvyJ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2025 06:16:57 +0000 Subject: Re: comments, The joy of FORTRAN Newsgroups: alt.folklore.computers,comp.os.linux.misc References: <59CJO.19674$MoU3.15170@fx36.iad> <1193769225.762545617.347047.peter_flass-yahoo.com@news.eternal-september.org> <j6KwP.62410$OrR5.58268@fx18.iad> <tcmcnTfrnOhGnFn6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com> <vq2fu3$6db$3@gal.iecc.com> <yI-cndUOFbNCsFj6nZ2dnZfqn_ednZ2d@giganews.com> <m2kt7qFsoc0U3@mid.individual.net> From: c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 01:16:54 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <m2kt7qFsoc0U3@mid.individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <U26dnbaeh9nE1Fj6nZ2dnZfqnPjvyJ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 23 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-TUsKotvAy/Y/tZvcirARCZwYTf8Ruzg2jkK/umLUnTT+88uY3D0fdqz3HEXme0IM2ALzmAtEfoEe5gt!fignEDyw9Q7grQsGVX7soPvVpzQWlip9DhYeyuYgNvhOqbneR8cdiHJQ9fWpqUTkX+METlRlnj/U X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2058 On 3/3/25 12:32 AM, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 2 Mar 2025 23:19:41 -0500, c186282 wrote: > >> On 3/2/25 3:43 PM, John Levine wrote: >>> According to c186282 <c186282@nnada.net>: >>>> Even 'clear' C is often NOT so clear - neither the syntax or logic. >>>> You've gotta EXPLAIN every step to yourself. >>> >>> Well, yeah. >>> >>> i += 2; /* add 1 to index */ >> >> Actually, that adds 2 to the index > > And here I thought it was an example of a comment that never was > updated... COULD be :-) Or the code could be bad. Diligence is mandatory.