Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<U7ad1EmJgRdHWf9kq4_f9rKU_Q0@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <U7ad1EmJgRdHWf9kq4_f9rKU_Q0@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net> <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <ynhjO.5165$3qya.840@fx05.ams4> <17e0a8161c6ccf81$886$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: OmtsYM-HCGqW5YiTOlPfK7FMkPM JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=U7ad1EmJgRdHWf9kq4_f9rKU_Q0@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Tue, 09 Jul 24 21:36:56 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-09T21:36:56Z/8940882"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> Bytes: 2281 Lines: 19 Le 09/07/2024 à 23:17, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 09.07.2024 o 22:54, Paul B. Andersen pisze: >> Den 09.07.2024 15:47, skrev Richard Hachel: >>> The paradox is this: The greatest relativistic physicist in the >>> universe (Richard Hachel) said that the effects of physics are >>> reciprocal by permutation of observer, and therefore, if we take the >>> INTERNAL mechanism of two watches, each will beat faster than the >>> other, both on the outward and return journey, or during a long >>> circular journey. >> >> A very naive notion. :-D Two problems: unfortunately I do not receive the answers from Paul B.Andersen in France, and it is therefore difficult for me to answer them. On the other hand, it is still very blunt to say that “Richard Hachel’s posts are very naive”. R.H.