Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <UIdzdVLJ9_wb6WmCm-cvy4bha8g@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: the notion of relativity of simultaneity
References: <t5AySA2aWT46Ra7AsAZqm8Hc3GM@jntp> <3816ef2676ce1aa6a8c37d69bc10aa33@www.novabbs.com> <CLH8zZ8XoLet8tC7KBErRRKWR7I@jntp>
 <ve5j7i$2jthj$1@dont-email.me> <XuyIJaxfFTfruSPJR8bWBtrAGq4@jntp> <ve81ld$333o4$1@dont-email.me>
 <YjSiiwllgxjO8USCxPs2jYwEQ3E@jntp> <vear43$3k24l$1@dont-email.me> <lmujuuF5spvU1@mid.individual.net>
 <vede3t$3tmm$1@dont-email.me>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: 25nO6QNRI0t8F6mgX2kXFV4Pf1Q
JNTP-ThreadID: M03ir3sQnaKnoNUOGTo8wLgKNI8
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=UIdzdVLJ9_wb6WmCm-cvy4bha8g@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 24 11:56:56 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/129.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-10-12T11:56:56Z/9057960"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 3858
Lines: 59

Le 12/10/2024 à 11:05, Mikko a écrit :
> 
>> This is actually not true, because the world which SRT describes isn't 
>> the world we live in.
> 
> A failed attempt is still an attempt. Therefore your "because" is wrong.
> SR is an attempt to describe the world. Later it was found out that the
> world is different but that does not affect what SR is.
> 
>> SRT is about a world, where all thinfgs drift around in a dark and 
>> starless void,
> 
> No, it is not. SR is about the geometry of the world, not about its matter
> content except that the matter content must be compatible with the geometry.

SR is first and foremost an attempt to explain the Michelson-Morley 
experiment.

The calculation shows that, according to the experiment, w=v+c=c

Which is absurd.

We must therefore understand why it is absurd, and why it is at the same 
time true.

I have explained these things. These things represent the very basis of 
the whole theory, and they extend not only to Galilean frames of reference 
in uniform translations, but also to rotating frames of reference, and to 
uniformly accelerated frames of reference.

I have also explained the Langevin paradox, the Andromeda paradox, and the 
Ehrenfest paradox.

The solution that we have been struggling with since 1905 is incredibly 
simple, and it is very disconcerting to see that the human mind 
voluntarily, stubbornly, refuses to validate it.

Probably artificial intelligence will soon be able to come into play, and 
declare: "But what are you doing with your theory of relativity? 
Everything is dramatically obvious, how can you not understand how the 
nature of simultaneity works? How is it possible that for more than 120 
years you have said everything backwards and in complete, COMPLETE 
confusion?"

Today's question, asked by Dr. Richard Hachel (Napoli Congress 2009):
Do you know the reason why this mathematical absurdity is nevertheless 
true?

W=v+c=c whatever v.

A seven-year-old child, informed by Hachel, will start laughing.

While the physicists, full of stupidity and arrogance, will drown.

"A seven-year-old child will lead them" says the Bible.

We must not spit on the prophecies of the ancients. They weren't that 
stupid.

R.H.