Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!usenet-fr.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <Ui5QIab4-uknPHltT14hSGMQfrA@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: What is "present time" in =?UTF-8?Q?physics=3F=20?=
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: JmpUHkZeFmsXha8IRDWtb1Ux_gI
JNTP-ThreadID: 8Spnv-VTEof6lhOi8EJNBPzNHBI
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=Ui5QIab4-uknPHltT14hSGMQfrA@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 24 15:10:25 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-09-04T15:10:25Z/9010471"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr>
Bytes: 3722
Lines: 39

The problem of relativity is the understanding of the notion of present 
time, that is to say the notion of simultaneity (which should not be 
confused with the notion of chronotropy).
Is there on the planet Fomalhaut IV, a princess Alexandra who lives there, 
at the same time as me; me who is here on earth?
That is to say in the same present moment?
It must be said that yes, since whatever procedure of universal 
synchronization I adopt, whether mine or that of Albert Einstein, there is 
necessarily a LABEL, and only one, to characterize the existence of 
Alexandra simultaneous with mine.
But according to the method of "synchronization of present time", we will 
not have the same label.
Einstein uses procedure M, Hachel procedure H.
Procedure M is the most practical, procedure H is the most true. Procedure 
M is the most practical, because it derives from the synchronization of 
the present time on a point M placed very far away in
an imaginary fourth dimension, and at an equal distance from all the 
points constituting our universe. This gives an abstract universal time, 
but very useful, where the notion of universal present time is flat, and 
reciprocal. If A exists at the same time as B for M, then B exists at the 
same time as A for M. It is very practical.
Procedure H proposed by Richard Hachel is less practical, but truer. It is 
less practical, because the notion of symmetry of the present time will 
not be absolute. But it is truer, physically more accurate, and more 
beautiful. It will remain eternally true experimentally, and eternally 
more beautiful philosophically. What could be more beautiful than saying 
to a child: "This horse in this meadow, this moon in the sky, this galaxy 
in this telescope, you see them instantly, as they are today, live-live".
What is uglier than human thought, which thinks it is intelligent,
even though it is full of stupid mockery, conceptual imbecilities, simply 
because it can say, as all morons say: "The speed of light is c, we know 
it, we have measured it, experimented with it, and we get 3.10^8m/s".
This is the most stupid reflection in the history of humanity, proposed by 
mocking morons (Python, John Baez) who think they are funny and 
intelligent, authorized mockers, but who have not understood anything 
about the notion of universal anisochrony and the two possible ways in 
which we can (or even MUST be able to) synchronize the clocks of the 
universe.

R.H.