Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <VEEsPfE0jSLHLIsdI6WRvMrDWaU@jntp>
JNTP-Route: nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Einstein's Mistakes
References: <8110cafcb23c6f0f60d6414719aba934@www.novabbs.com> <374914495b8f592bcb19b2cfb0dce968@www.novabbs.com>
 <67d1b2c24f289b892604895a401fbe86@www.novabbs.com> <61b46394e14345f28a4a1615ddddd374@www.novabbs.com>
 <vf86c7$1fueh$1@dont-email.me> <a2485088f7b96dd773e014a8809ff97b@www.novabbs.com> <x_xSO.2461785$VK2e.487693@fx01.ams4>
 <671abf29$0$525$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <vff77l$31lns$1@dont-email.me> <671ca629$1$11440$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
JNTP-HashClient: 8oc9PZ-sySWFQvZPB_mNC1jHIHw
JNTP-ThreadID: 8110cafcb23c6f0f60d6414719aba934@www.novabbs.com
JNTP-Uri: https://www.nemoweb.net/?DataID=VEEsPfE0jSLHLIsdI6WRvMrDWaU@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/1.0
JNTP-OriginServer: nemoweb.net
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 24 11:35:05 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/130.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Injection-Info: nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-10-26T11:35:05Z/9075434"; posting-account="4@nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@liscati.fr.invalid>
Bytes: 2880
Lines: 28

Le 26/10/2024 à 10:19, nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) a écrit :
> Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-10-24 21:42:00 +0000, J. J. Lodder said:
>> 
>> > Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:

>> The problem with using just initials that two crackpots can have the 
>> same ones. At first reading I thought you meant "Dr" Hachel, who is 
>> indeed completely clueless about many things, but I was puzzled as I 
>> didn't think he had contributed to this thread.
> 
> Sorry, I didn't pay attention. I try to focus on content, if any.
> To the point: do you have grounds for supposing one RH to be more
> clueless about the general state of physics than the other one is?
> 
> Jan

If someone tells you: "The Beatles didn't know how to compose", or "Victor 
Hugo didn't know how to write", or "Eddy Merckx didn't know how to ride a 
bike", be wary of his mental capacities.

If someone tells you "Doctor Hachel is perfectly ignorant in physics", 
weigh his words on a scale, before swallowing them.

It's more rational than throwing words into the air, without knowing, 
without understanding what is said, and simply to show off.

R.H.