Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<VKKdnXsS37myoQH6nZ2dnZfqnPXErN_e@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:57:51 +0000
Subject: Re: math, is it just physics?
Newsgroups: sci.math
References: <vnbg90$200p5$1@dont-email.me> <vncq1f$29v5v$2@dont-email.me>
 <ed39f7f86288385d55f75d99082d4fe54f766092@i2pn2.org>
 <VKKdnXgS37kKpgH6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 18:57:54 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <VKKdnXgS37kKpgH6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <VKKdnXsS37myoQH6nZ2dnZfqnPXErN_e@giganews.com>
Lines: 26
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-8eCbfaN41QzDxpxh0fmdXzHkiwWCQ/ol21QARbd9PTDBjuE8NNCFiO6KR7WHXORe6HgpX3hPOCboe2N!AM+7bYDcJRpgjRUDYss6DyTzsSsf3s/8VBYbjOxO1ZoDN3UwOTW+B6rmhdto0Eav6cxABMoxa9Oo
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2323

On 01/30/2025 06:55 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
> On 01/29/2025 02:46 AM, joes wrote:
>> Am Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:48:47 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>> On 28.01.2025 21:56, sobriquet wrote:
>>>>
>>>> So in a way one could claim that concepts like integers and their
>>>> properties and relationships can be more or less empirically observed
>>>> in the behavior and properties of things like elementary particles such
>>>> as electrons or fields.
>>> Or bricks, marbles, people etc. The natural numbers have been abstracted
>>> from reality. The laws like "the existence of n implies the existence of
>>> n+1" were so evident, that no axioms appeared necessary before Dedekind,
>>> Peano, Schmidt etc. Only Cantor's assumption of an actual set with |ℕ|
>>> being a fixed quantity greater than all numbers is not abstracted from
>>> reality.
>> Oh PLEASE show me something physically infinite.
>>
>
> 0 m/s = ? s/m, ..., ?
>
>


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyWpZQny5cY&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=16