| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<VKKdnXsS37myoQH6nZ2dnZfqnPXErN_e@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 02:57:51 +0000 Subject: Re: math, is it just physics? Newsgroups: sci.math References: <vnbg90$200p5$1@dont-email.me> <vncq1f$29v5v$2@dont-email.me> <ed39f7f86288385d55f75d99082d4fe54f766092@i2pn2.org> <VKKdnXgS37kKpgH6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 18:57:54 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <VKKdnXgS37kKpgH6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <VKKdnXsS37myoQH6nZ2dnZfqnPXErN_e@giganews.com> Lines: 26 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-8eCbfaN41QzDxpxh0fmdXzHkiwWCQ/ol21QARbd9PTDBjuE8NNCFiO6KR7WHXORe6HgpX3hPOCboe2N!AM+7bYDcJRpgjRUDYss6DyTzsSsf3s/8VBYbjOxO1ZoDN3UwOTW+B6rmhdto0Eav6cxABMoxa9Oo X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 2323 On 01/30/2025 06:55 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 01/29/2025 02:46 AM, joes wrote: >> Am Wed, 29 Jan 2025 09:48:47 +0100 schrieb WM: >>> On 28.01.2025 21:56, sobriquet wrote: >>>> >>>> So in a way one could claim that concepts like integers and their >>>> properties and relationships can be more or less empirically observed >>>> in the behavior and properties of things like elementary particles such >>>> as electrons or fields. >>> Or bricks, marbles, people etc. The natural numbers have been abstracted >>> from reality. The laws like "the existence of n implies the existence of >>> n+1" were so evident, that no axioms appeared necessary before Dedekind, >>> Peano, Schmidt etc. Only Cantor's assumption of an actual set with |ℕ| >>> being a fixed quantity greater than all numbers is not abstracted from >>> reality. >> Oh PLEASE show me something physically infinite. >> > > 0 m/s = ? s/m, ..., ? > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyWpZQny5cY&list=PLb7rLSBiE7F4eHy5vT61UYFR7_BIhwcOY&index=16