Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<VY2dnZdLssdIfrf6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 03:34:45 +0000
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 22:34:44 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net>
Subject: {OT} Re: 30 Years Of Netscape
Newsgroups: alt.comp.software.firefox,comp.misc
References: <vgb7m9$13ba2$1@dont-email.me>
 <haGdnemuj7Bb77f6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <vge40o$1nfmk$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: hu-HU
In-Reply-To: <vge40o$1nfmk$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <VY2dnZdLssdIfrf6nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Lines: 26
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-UdN1arr6ZTomoJTDzy4eDhV/TLaLcMzcCIdZSWIGq8wdMeShB2MHPRJbUBgopkIWn4jn48f2g8OjGFc!qf60qSv5LfSUs040ACDgjipcjZxpDH/OazQYqYqnsJBrr+9R24sCqGjPla0OgF6nQBMsl9mmFpA=
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2276

On 11/5/24 16:51, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 14:32:21 -0500, bad sector wrote:
> 
>> On 11/4/24 14:35, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>> One important thing Netscape did before going completely defunct was to
>>> open-source the browser.
>>
>> THAT was a class act! I did something vaguely similar when I took out a
>> provisional patent and then let it lapse for the express purpose of thus
>> hard-wiring the idea into public domain to prevent anyone from ever
>> being able to take out a patent on the same idea.
> 
> Patents in the public interest ... now THAT I can applaud!

yeah, I was rather proud of it, seems like in another life now

> But then, simply publishing the idea would, in theory, count as “prior
> art”, wouldn’t it? Though in practice it is very hard to get patents
> invalidated anyway, at least in the US system (also *cough* East Texas
> *cough*).

Ideally 'prior art' would block another applicant, but yes, once granted 
overturning would be a task and a half, especially with thin records.