Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp
Message-ID: <VtWMPcrsP6z8IXS625c43CiJiag@jntp>
JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net
JNTP-DataType: Article
Subject: Re: Getting there at last...
References: <1HWE6H1jV8YTvxfaaL7fnCCcpe8@jntp> <l6puenFeh5pU1@mid.individual.net> <bigu1zNUD9n8JIWm2zHpTNzxgBQ@jntp>
 <l71kmnFje11U1@mid.individual.net> <660BAEAC.433D@ix.netcom.com> <l749ffF14h9U1@mid.individual.net>
 <KhZ2Hz2FE9CXExXJ8V8CpS5cLpw@jntp> <l79onlFqd6dU1@mid.individual.net> <IXQv8LazUgNGHOfaop5NsVJfpZ0@jntp>
 <l7ca43F7jrnU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
JNTP-HashClient: SplzInuDPbUCLx-eIbTHRdm-tdI
JNTP-ThreadID: 5ipMllmo3ZDdVjvYIsvl1ofrDVs
JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=VtWMPcrsP6z8IXS625c43CiJiag@jntp
User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a
JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 24 01:25:58 +0000
Organization: Nemoweb
JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/121.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Edg/121.0.0.0
Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="601f4a4a60dc6043f0c3ab83656fd85fb6bc327d"; logging-data="2024-04-07T01:25:58Z/8808223"; posting-account="219@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com"
JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1
JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96
From: Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com>
Bytes: 10366
Lines: 257

Le 06/04/2024 à 16:58, Thomas Heger a écrit :
> Am 06.04.2024 um 02:07 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>> Le 05/04/2024 à 18:49, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>> Am 04.04.2024 um 04:18 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>> Le 03/04/2024 à 16:58, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>> Am 02.04.2024 um 09:07 schrieb The Starmaker:
>>>>>> Thomas Heger wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 30.03.2024 um 11:38 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>>>>> Le 30/03/2024 à 18:48, Thomas Heger a écrit :
>>>>>>>>> Am 28.03.2024 um 08:09 schrieb Arindam Banerjee:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you like my 'book'
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ur3_giuk2l439fxUa8QHX4wTDxBEaM6lOlgVUa0cFU4/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> It is some 100 times better than the one used before.  Much less power
>>>> consumption, far more force on the bullet which could be a guided
>>>> missile at hypersonic speeds.
>>>>
>>>> As for my gun, check out
>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ
>>>> Follow the link to the 2-sec video.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and trying to connect QM and GR is...apples and oranges.
>>>>
>>>> Both are nonsense to me.
>>>> When inertia is busted, entropy and relativity and quantum are also
>>>> busted.
>>>> Aether is back, filling the infinite universe.
>>>>
>>>> I hope you realise that one day.
>>>
>>> I have actually written a longish critique of 'On the electrodynamics
>>> of moving bodies'
>>> (here:
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view )
>>>
>>> and know what you mean.
>>>
>>> But I think, that relativity is not entirely wrong.
>>
>> It is entirely wrong from top to bottom.
> 
> 'relativity' is actually an undisputable fact, because everything moves 
> relative to something else.
> 
> It's such a simple fact, that hardly anybody can reject it.
> 
> There exist another view, which is based on Newton's absolute space, 
> which would allow to defince velocity in respect to the universe.
> 
> This view is actually the position of Einstein in SRT, even if it is 
> self-contradicting.
> 
> We can see this in the use of velocity v without definition of a 
> reference point, in respect to which velocity is measured.
> 
> This would require an absolute space, which Einstein declared to not exist.
> 
> 
>> It is not science, but Jewish dogma to get rid of the Arya notion of aum
>> (aether) pervading the universe.
> 
> Religion and science are not exactly the same thing, therefore you 
> should not mix believe and theoretical physics.
> 
> Physics is as natural science not concerned with religious bias and can 
> simply ignore everything from whatever believe system.
> 
> That's why there exists no 'Aryan physics', but only true physics.
> 
> Whether you like it or not, whether you profit from it or if it 
> undermines you believes, that isn't the business of science.
> 
> Science can only deliver truth.
> 
>> So to begin with, Einstein et al were mocked and ridiculed just as I am
>> today, by the establishment.
> 
> Well, your theories are a different story, because highly efficiant rail 
> guns are a politiical issue, which could eventually change the political 
> worldmap.
> 
>>
>> The eminence of relativity today is not due to any science, but to
>> politics driven by money, media and academia on one hand, and the fear
>> of nukes by the public on the other, which wrongly thinks that the great
>> energies released are due to e=mcc.
>>
>>> It is a principle, which is VERY counterintuitive and not discussed
>>> very often:
>>
>> It is nonsense, period.
> No.
> 
> There is a guy named Tom Bearden, who wrote about it.
>>>
>>> we have a forward and a backwards time, which both occur and are both
>>> real.
>>
>> A dogmatic assertion. There is NO backwards time. This is pure nonsense.
>> Yes there are such things as phase differences, meaning a signal can go
>> on two different paths and meet at different times at the same place,
>> causing interference.
>> But that does not mean that time goes backwards.
> 
> I have based my own theory upon bi-quaternions (aka 'complex four-vectors').

Theory is fine, so long as fact is also involved, in the scientific 
method.
> 
> They form a field and are internally connected, as if they are 
> multiplied together with the neighbor.

Where is that field?  Any measurements possible?
> 
> The imaginary axis builds the axis of time and the three real units the 
> axes of space.

Makes no sense.
> 
> Now this construct is anti-symmetric. that means, it takes two rotations 
> to return to the initial state.

Makes no sense.
> 
> After one rotation the axis of time points into the opposite direction 
> and everything is fliped over to a mirror image.

The axis "of time?" was said to be imaginary, now how can it suddenly 
become real?
Rest makes no sense.
> 
> Now we could assume, that such a 'world behind the mirror' does in fact 
> exist, where time runs (in our view) backwards.

Far too imaginary. Makes no sense in the scientific sense.
> 
> That world is made from anti-matter.

From an assumption made earlier, we now come to presumption.
Makes no scientific sense.
> 
> But seen from there our world is made from anti-matter and our time runs 
> backwards.

Amazing how imaginations and assumptions suddenly become realities.
> 
> That is actually the main priciple of relativity: that relations depend 
> on the own point of view.

That I agree, but that has nothing to do with the speed of light being 
independent of the speed of the emitter.
> 
> E.g. if I see you moving, you can see me moving and we cannot decide, 
> who is correct.

Some still robot on an inertial frame can decide who is moving where and 
how.
> 
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========