Path: ...!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 04:25:17 +0000
Subject: Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.linux.misc
References: <pan$26699$6602b79b$4abe425a$df32a923@gnu.rocks>
 <_OmcnZpYmdE-PYX6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <wwvldyfmenf.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vfcjir$2gc7o$4@dont-email.me>
 <wwvv7xh1jee.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> <vfeh5a$2qk0v$1@dont-email.me>
 <slrnvhnn9i.2ou1.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <vfh570$3brp2$2@dont-email.me> <20241025153958.0000222f@gmail.com>
 <vfhbt5$3d372$2@dont-email.me> <vfhkm0$3i0mb$1@dont-email.me>
 <lo3dvqFo19fU2@mid.individual.net> <vfi017$3jf3g$4@dont-email.me>
 <aq6dnU74jY9CDoH6nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@earthlink.com>
 <vfiem5$3m055$1@dont-email.me>
From: "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
Organization: wokiesux
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 00:25:16 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.13.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <vfiem5$3m055$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <WLucnbmwVpAwXYD6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Lines: 37
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 99.101.150.97
X-Trace: sv3-YmBGlbp7krdvfDfscQz3zy4JcnX1uPAL+ybVoxYOANzcjG3Dlaqb5KP0ReKRNyVylVTYyHMGZ1H9/SE!jq9MBYbYBBcfqqGHglkLzppAhJqncXbkuKswsInNSasPeLKdjZVzrNg8foeoLx1aXqc3ZKjXu/8l!TjGUaA0pgHLz/qbOWDVK
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 3013

On 10/26/24 6:01 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 26/10/2024 08:01, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>> On 10/26/24 1:51 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>> On 26 Oct 2024 05:45:31 GMT, rbowman wrote:
>>>
>>>> About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather than
>>>> nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. 
>>>> That
>>>> was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on.
>>>
>>> Did he mention the Anthropic Principle at all?
>>>
>>> That’s a controversial one. Fred Hoyle used it to predict the 
>>> existence of
>>> an energetic state of the carbon atom without which heavier elements 
>>> could
>>> not be synthesized.
>>
>>
>>    All philosophy is bullshit - including this philosophy  :-)
>>
>>
> That is the reaction of 99% of those who are exposed to it.
> 
> But it isn't.  It has tools enabling you to think in extremely different 
> ways.

   That's what LSD is for  :-)

   Sorry, bullshit. That's the most useful take.

> The problem is most people think it purports to reveal Truth, but it 
> doesn't. It is however and interesting study of Lies.

   Lies/mistakes and long LONG "justifications" of said lies/mistakes.

   Waste of bandwidth.