| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<WxadnVVJ3YgglXj6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!border-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:13:49 +0000 Subject: Re: F2FS On USB Sticks? Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc References: <vrikv7$icpd$1@dont-email.me> <sm0v7s2spt5.fsf@lakka.kapsi.fi> <lYednSXFeZiM00D6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> <g520blxb3v.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vrkdlc$257qv$3@dont-email.me> <m46f8sFcqfqU2@mid.individual.net> <-02dnTLnIvSN6kP6nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com> <vrm2v3$3cvq6$1@news1.tnib.de> <vs2l0e$3evlh$1@dont-email.me> From: c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 04:13:41 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <vs2l0e$3evlh$1@dont-email.me> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <WxadnVVJ3YgglXj6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 23 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-0q1AN7iCRKjpYhzTCMjc+pqq6WWEHmPQ2EhMJSorXmfF9YOWx8RSPzhIZhwNiBajw1eZc7P/60edNV7!TOua9Pq66hqLaO0h1v5xfNjXiRdHaujXrRFq2zuAIr6ExNfbU4R/uSi8QLhWUXuveMxnEW9JQI3n X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 On 3/27/25 12:42 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 11:21:23 +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > >>> Don't love UEFI at all >> >> You should! It's neat. > > The idea may seem good, the execution seems to leave something to be > desired. It’s supposed to be OS-independent, but in practice the vendors > only test that it boots Windows OK before shipping. So it’s left to the > developers of the other OSes (mainly Linux, of course) to add hacks to > work around all the bugs and gaps in their implementations of the spec. Yep ... wound up seriously dedicated to Winders. Tricks/tweaks/pain associated with making it work OK with Linux and other stuff. STILL worry about it being 'vulnerable' - spying, hacking. IF it's practical to get non-UEFI boot then I still go that way.