| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<XJ2cnWe2BdAJMfD6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-4.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 19:20:52 +0000 Subject: Re: Terence Tao, "Machine Assisted Proof" Newsgroups: sci.math References: <url12v$m5i4$2@solani.org> <YIadnaDB9KvAtEP4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> From: Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 11:20:54 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <YIadnaDB9KvAtEP4nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@giganews.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <XJ2cnWe2BdAJMfD6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> Lines: 94 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-ybsB/ODK8b0VO7otnkZnmDycbBc9j//g856X6g8nQ2M2lqIzRb3AtxbjpXK1tI4F7lmCwQoanKgjsbU!aogBTLtBOzK70Mis4VZG3m6D/KD/28dsbpG3fo6I8pp7zyQccb6j15eFuAX1fkEQALSOQsQV31JB X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 Bytes: 4080 On 02/27/2024 10:26 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote: > On 02/27/2024 08:02 AM, Mild Shock wrote: >> >> Terence Tao, "Machine Assisted Proof" >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AayZuuDDKP0 > > So, "Lean is the new concept-script Begriff"? > > Mizar, Metamath, I suppose it was Mizar, and Z, > that was going to "canonize a formal library > of derivation methods and associated results". > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mizar_system > > "Mizar: Since 1973...." > > Many type inference systems, .... > > "Classical" logic is "quasi-modal", ..., usually, > "classical quasi-modal logic". > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Large-scale_mathematical_formalization_projects > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Formal_systems > > It seems like a reasonable sort of system, > just, enumerates logical antinomies, then > each of what results the principal branches > of the singularities either way, makes little theories, > with their limits and their incompleteness. > An example of this is ZF as it's usually considered. > > The real issue for mathematics is getting to > where the types, for completions, are in effect > and actual, because, it's a real role for foundations. > > Or as he put it, "trusting the compiler". > > > Isoperimetric theorems and packing problems, > they're pretty related. Basically looking for > when the angle of the packing and packed are > same, given arbitrary configurations around, .... > > > It seems like "New value of computer assistance? > More like the entire field is already based on it." > > When they started pushing calculators in school, > it was like, I'm going to need trig and 1/x and > this fractional powers button is great, also e. > The rest of the graphing was like "no, thanks, > school already taught me". > > So, Kepler conjecture, sphere-packing, seems for > a sort of equi-partitioning and equi-packing sort > of approach, for the isoperimetric, the isopacked. > > > > Then he gets into Faltings purity and it's like > the only reason we're talking about Faltings purity > is because Scholze is dirty. > > "This theorem is essential...", euh, here this is > the usual difference between "not.need T" and "need not.T", > > > Homotopy Type Theory is the strength of ZFC plus > two large cardinals, ..., it adds unvalency. Well, sure, > it's not consistent anymore, but it is more complete. > > It's like a new math lib was announced, "you're right". > > > > Freiman-Rusza conjecture, looks interesting, > it's in doubling-spaces. > > > Old wrapped as new, .... > > > I'm a fan, and kind of demand, Faltings purity. > > > For cross-checking compilers is "a little language > with a term re-write system that results Mizar, Metamath, > Coq, Lean, lambda calculus, category theory, descriptive > set theory, ....". > >