Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<XXPbPRsdhaYaKB7KZdQr_ljWUOk@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <XXPbPRsdhaYaKB7KZdQr_ljWUOk@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Contradiction of bijections as a measure for infinite sets References: <qHqKnNhkFFpow5Tl3Eiz12-8JEI@jntp> <uu6fo6$3dq4t$1@i2pn2.org> <ZIe3ohnd0vDG1-QosVonoapT7V8@jntp> <uu9j79$3gijc$8@i2pn2.org> <5fxRDo_iHMUImphe8RGVplmYuCQ@jntp> <uuc9cr$3j5g3$1@i2pn2.org> <nVHZfuyg7O6FHCXZXigDgC2s8EU@jntp> <uufegr$3p7r0$1@i2pn2.org> <XNMbPeWA6KdZNjVAaRrj0SXXhxo@jntp> <e392b515-c9ad-4e57-8edd-ceedc8b67bea@att.net> Newsgroups: sci.math JNTP-HashClient: OCvwizIYT3nHmXsRt7qwvNFlbms JNTP-ThreadID: 4YLc1knY-8u5i_KQ0oWqy89D7aY JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=XXPbPRsdhaYaKB7KZdQr_ljWUOk@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Wed, 03 Apr 24 13:32:28 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/123.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="48fd2b1f484c46a64b64ce96d8a3d29d23ea03ed"; logging-data="2024-04-03T13:32:28Z/8803870"; posting-account="217@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> Bytes: 1899 Lines: 11 Le 02/04/2024 à 17:51, Jim Burns a écrit : > On 4/2/2024 3:36 AM, WM wrote: > If your assumption leads to "no bijection", > but there is a bijection, > then your assumption is wrong. My trick proves that there is no bijection. Or could you explain why first bijecting n and n/1 should destroy an existing bijection? Regards, WM