Path: ...!local-3.nntp.ord.giganews.com!local-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!local-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 07:57:25 +0000
Newsgroups: rec.games.frp.dnd
Subject: Re: OneDnD seems to mainstream psionics
From: Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 03:57:07 -0400
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.12N (x86 32bit)
References: <v0dmh2$1rvpq$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki>
 <v0dqv3$323o9$4@dont-email.me> <7ivk2j560cru7gbb1eb1gl0drn76k2pg6b@4ax.com>
 <v0e6v4$1u868$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki> <v0eipj$37jkh$2@dont-email.me>
 <v0frrd$2n26e$1@sibirocobombus.campaignwiki> <v0gdb2$3o4p8$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID: <XamdnY4Tb4Z4a9P7nZ2dnZfqnPEAAAAA@giganews.com>
Lines: 31
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-DtOAh39pAWkSeadVRjm1lwdAjHFnj1u/fKKetuZDjVjOb0uWLNtJ0XyvXjA75yeuGrAzN0CWI7XfoCD!qomX3NI8W+L+KAsAXW+b29nLw5F6RcE0zAYbEuhZT/Kdve2dFwvcHmZGdcU2xptqZ+BlXH4JYfgF
X-Complaints-To: abuse@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
Bytes: 2618

In article <v0gdb2$3o4p8$1@dont-email.me>, justisaur@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 4/26/2024 1:52 AM, Kyonshi wrote:
>> On 4/25/2024 11:43 PM, Justisaur wrote:
>>> On 4/25/2024 10:57 AM, Kyonshi wrote:
>>>> On 4/25/2024 6:16 PM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

>>>> Don't forget warlocks, which didn't use to be a thing but now are. On 
>>>> the other hand it sounds as if those they want to have are just 
>>>> variations on fighters and thieves instead of proper psions. 
>>>
>>> Warlocks and Sorcerers were both added in 3.5e  I liked the iterations 
>>> in that edition much better.  They both feel like they should be 
>>> sub-classes and in optional books.  Do you really need 3 charisma 
>>> based arcane full caster base classes in the PHB?  Heck there's only 2 
>>> full physical classes.
>> 
>> Warlocks were introduced in 3.5? Must have missed that, but I got 
>> disinterested about that edition pretty quick. I burned out on 3e back 
>> in the day and got completely turned off when 4e came around. That's 
>> when I shifted to older editions.
>
>Complete Arcane player's handbook. I did have someone play it.  It felt 
>very underpowered, but it had a lot more sustain with eldritch blast 
>than wizards.  It's much better balanced in 5e

If memory serves, Warlocks in 3.x could cast Eldritch Blast whenever they 
wanted, a rule a min-maxer friend of mine used for his PCs.

--
Let's go Brandon!